Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster lunch

1491 - The utility of risk factors proposed in a prospective clinical trial in the management of ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer patients: Feedback from the real world (107P)

Date

18 Nov 2017

Session

Poster lunch

Topics

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Kanako Yoshitsugu

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_10): x26-x34. 10.1093/annonc/mdx654

Authors

K. Yoshitsugu, J. Watanabe

Author affiliations

  • Breast Oncology, Shizuoka Cancer Center, 411-8777 - Shizuoka/JP
More

Resources

Abstract 1491

Background

Some risk factors (RFs) in the management of ER-positive, HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (ER+HER2-MBC), such as a shorter disease-free interval (DFI), visceral involvement or high tumor burden, have been identified in prospective clinical trials; however, the utility of those RFs in the real world has not been well discussed.

Methods

We reviewed our medical records from 2002 to present to assess the utility of RFs (DFI≤24 months [DFI≤24M]; visceral metastases [VIS]; prior (neo)adjuvant anthracycline and/or taxane [A/T]; or ≥ 3 metastatic organs [≥3 ORG]) defined in the TURANDOT risk factor analyses (Brodowicz T, Br J Cancer, 2014), a first-line bevacizumab trial of HR+HER2-MBC patients. According to the analysis, patients with ≥2 RFs were classified as “high-risk (HiR)”, and others were classified as “low-risk (LoR)”. Statistical analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meyer method and a multivariate COX regression analysis.

Results

We identified 311 ER+HER2-MBC (224 recurrent, 87 advanced) patients who underwent chemotherapy (CTx). The most common RF at the initiation of first-line CTx was VIS (N = 186, 59.8%), followed by A/T, ≥3 ORG and DFI≤24M. The distribution of RFs was as follows: 0 in 89 (28.6%), 1 in 93 (29.9%), 2 in 94 (30.2%), 3 in 30 (9.6%), and 4 in 5 (1.7%). The survival from the initiation of CTx (OSCTx) was significantly poorer in HiR patients than LoR ones (median 815.0 vs. 1062.0 days, p 

Conclusions

Our review suggests that RFs such as high tumor burden and shorter DFI identified in prospective randomized studies are applicable to patients in the real world, even with heterogeneous backgrounds.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Junichiro Watanabe

Funding

None

Disclosure

J. Watanabe: Honoraria from AstraZeneca Japan, Chugai Pharmaceuticals, Eisai, Novartis Pharma Japan, Taiho pharmaceuticals, and advisory board member of AstraZeneca Japan, Eisai.

All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.