Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster lunch

1971 - Importance of Immunohistochemistry for quick selection of Breast Cancer Patients having BRCA1/2 mutations for their better treatment strategy. Pilot study in eastern India (113P)

Date

18 Nov 2017

Session

Poster lunch

Presenters

Jayasri Basak

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_10): x26-x34. 10.1093/annonc/mdx654

Authors

J. Basak1, A. Chakraborty2, A. Mukhopadhyay1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Dept. Of Molecular Biology, Netaji Subhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institute, 700016 - Kolkata/IN
  • 2 Cellullar And Molecular Biology Division, The Hormel Institute University of Minnesota, Austin - Minnesota/US
More

Resources

Abstract 1971

Background

In India, breast cancer is the second most common malignant condition among women. It is hereditary in 10% of cases, the majority related to mutations in the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. The presence of BRCA germline mutations in breast/ovarian carcinomas has been shown to have prognostic and therapeutic significance. Identification of tumours with BRCA defects has therapeutic and prognostic implications. Our objective was to assess whether immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) for BRCA is an effective method for the detection of BRCA dysfunction in hereditary breast carcinoma or not.

Methods

We have selected 231 patients for BRCA1/2 mutation detection during Aug.2010 to Oct.2015 from the breast cancer patients attended our hospital, NCRI. After taking written consent 4-5ml peripheral blood and/or operated tissue (where possible) were collected from BC patients. BRCA1/2 mutations were identified by ARMS-PCR, DNA sequencing and whole genome sequencing. We performed IHC staining with BRCA1 and BRCA2 antibody to distinguish tumour status between patients according to their indication of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation.

Results

Average age of the patients was 45.87±1.57 yrs. BRCA1/2 mutations were identified in 24 (10.38%) patientsthrough above mentioned methods. Tumour samples fromnine BRCA positive cases and 15BRCA negative cases were chosen for investigation of IHC. Out of 9 samples with BRCA mutations, 7were BRCA immunostainingnegative, with absence of nuclear or cytoplasmic staining. On the otherhand, from the 15 patients negative for mutations in both genes, 12 were positive for BRCA1immunostaining with a clear nuclear immunoreactivity in tumour cells. From ROCcurve analysis, it was found that IHC negativity (area- 0.211, CI: 0.011-0.411) isassociated (p = 0.02) with BRCA positivity.

Conclusions

In conclusion, we observed a high specificity for the prediction of BRCA1/2 carriers withimmunohistochemistry using BRCA antibody. Validation of this assay, using a larger sample, will allow using immunohistochemistry to decide which high-risk patients should be screenedfirst for the BRCA mutation gene.

Clinical trial identification

NA

Legal entity responsible for the study

Netaji Suibhas Chandra Bose Cancer Research Institue

Funding

None

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.