Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Phase I study of S-1, irinotecan plus oxaliplatin combination therapy for advanced pancreatic cancer

Date

19 Dec 2015

Session

Poster presentation 1

Presenters

SATOSHI Shiba

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 42-70. 10.1093/annonc/mdv523

Authors

S. Shiba1, H. Ueno1, M. Chigusa2, M. Sasaki1, T. Oishi1, H. Hosoi1, S. Kondo1, Y. Sakamoto1, T. Okusaka1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Hepatobiliary And Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, 1040045 - Tokyo/JP
  • 2 Hepatobiliary And Pancreatic Oncology, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo/JP
More

Resources

Aim/Background

A dose-finding study was performed to evaluate the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD), and recommended dose (RD) for the triplet regimen S–IROX, which consists of S–1, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin. Its safety and efficacy in patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were assessed.

Methods

Patients were required to have a histologically proven, adenosquamous or adenocarcinoma and should not have received chemotherapy previously. Patients were excluded if they had UGT genetic polymorphisms of homozygous UGT1A1*6 or *28 or heterozygous UGT1A1*6 and*28. A standard 3 + 3 dose-escalation design was implemented to define the recommended phase II dose using six predefined dose levels of S–IROX. Patients orally received escalating doses of S–1 (50 mg and 60 mg twice daily) on days 1–7, an escalating dose of intravenous irinotecan (100, 120, 150, 165, and 180 mg/m2) on day 1, and a fixed dose of intravenous oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2) on day 1 every two weeks.

Results

Eighteen patients (females, 7; males, 11) were enrolled and treated with three dose levels. Four patients had metal stents because of malignant biliary obstruction and nine patients had the heterogeneous type of UGT1A1 gene. DLT was observed in 1 of 6 patients at level 0 (S–1 50 mg twice daily, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2); in 2 of 6 patients at level 1 (S–1 60 mg twice daily, irinotecan 150 mg/m2, andoxaliplatin 85 mg/m2); and in 2 of 6 patients at level 2 (S–1 60 mg twice daily, irinotecan 165 mg/m2, and oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2). In the level 2 cohort, one remaining patient is being still under observation; hence, the MTD and RD values have not been established yet. The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events included hyperglycemia (24%), neutropenia (18%), diarrhea (18%), decreased platelet count (12%), and nausea (12%). The tumor response rate was 57.1%; among 14 patients whose response could be evaluated, 8 had partial response and 5 had stable disease.

Conclusions

As the phase I trial is ongoing, the MTD and RD values have not been fully established yet. Nevertheless, S–IROX appears to have a manageable toxicity profile and high antitumor activity. In the near future, one of three doses (150, 165, or 180 mg/m2) of irinotecan will be identified as the RD.

Clinical trial identification

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings