Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster presentation 1

654 - Pharmacoeconomic analysis of XELOX versus FOLFOX for metastatic colorectal cancer first-line treatment in Taiwan


19 Dec 2015


Poster presentation 1


Hong-Hwa Chen


Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 42-70. 10.1093/annonc/mdv523


H. Chen1, C. Chang2, L. Chen3, W.T. Chen4, T. Hsu5, J. Wang6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Colorectal Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung, 833 - Kaohsiung/TW
  • 2 Crs, Changhua Christian Hospital Cancer Research Center, Changhua City/TW
  • 3 Colon & Rectal Surgery, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung/TW
  • 4 Crs, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung/TW
  • 5 Crs, Taipei Medical Unversity Hospital, Taipei/TW
  • 6 Crs, Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital,Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung/TW


Abstract 654


XELOX (capecitabine plus oxaliplatin) has been shown in study NO16966 to be non-inferior to FOLFOX-4 (5-FU/LV plus oxaliplatin) for first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). We developed a pharmacoeconomic model to compare direct costs of XELOX with FOLFOX-4 from the payer's perspective in Taiwan.


Two complementary cost-minimization analyses were performed to compare the costs of XELOX with FOLFOX-4, both using costs for Taiwan: one looking at the medical resource utilization of these regimens in Taiwan, and the other based on safety/efficacy data from NO16966. Local treatment regimens and drug administration patterns were derived from the results of an expert panel survey conducted among Taiwanese physicians. Unit costs were estimated from the 2009 Taiwan Bureau of National Health Insurance (BNHI) fee schedules. Direct medical costs were associated with the drugs, administration, and adverse event management.


Although XELOX had higher drug costs, these were offset by the higher chemotherapy administration costs for FOLFOX-4, resulting in an overall cost saving with XELOX of NT$35,091 ($1,170; NT$30 = ∼1US$) by 6 months. For the analysis based on NO16966, this difference was NT$71,285 ($2,376).


XELOX for the first-line treatment of mCRC can effectively release the budget pressure for Taiwan's BNHI.

Clinical trial identification


All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings