Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Investigating various thresholds as immunohistochemistry cut-offs for observer agreement

Date

19 Dec 2015

Session

Poster presentation 1

Presenters

Asif Ali

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 8-15. 10.1093/annonc/mdv518

Authors

A. Ali1, S. Bell2, A. Bilsland3, J. Slavin2, V. Lynch2, M. Elgoweini2, M. Derakhshan4, K. Oien3, F. Duthie2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pathology, Khyber Medical University, 25100 - Peshawar/PK
  • 2 Pathology, Southern General Hospital, Glasgow/GB
  • 3 Wolfson Wohl Cancer Research Center, University of Glasgow, Glasgow/GB
  • 4 Institute Of Cardiovascular And Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow/GB
More

Resources

Abstract 1133

Aim/Background

Clinical translation of immunohistochemistry (IHC) biomarkers requires a reliable and reproducible cut-off for interpretation of immunostaining. Most of the IHC biomarker research focuses on the clinical relevance (diagnostic or prognostic utility) of cut-offs with less emphasis on observer agreement using these cut-offs. We identified three cut-offs from our diagnostic IHC work and literature namely, 10% positive epithelial cells (10% hereafter), 20% positive epithelial cells (20% hereafter) and moderate to strong staining intensity (+2/ + 3 hereafter) for investigating observer agreement. The aim was to establish consensus based cut-off(s) that could potentially be used by pathologists.

Methods

A series of 36 IHC images of microarray cores for four IHC biomarkers with variable staining intensity and percentage of positive cells was used for investigating inter- and intra-observer agreement. Seven pathologists participated in the study and they scored the immunostaining of each image for the three cut-offs. Kappa statistic was used to assess the strength of agreement for each cut-off.

Results

The inter-observer agreement between all seven pathologists using the three cut-offs was reasonably good. A good agreement was observed for experienced pathologists using 10% cut-offs and the agreement was statistically higher than junior pathologists (p = 0.02). In addition, the mean intra-observer agreement for all seven pathologists using the three cut-offs was reasonably good. For all three cut-offs a positive correlation was observed with perceived ease of interpretations (p < 0.0001 for 10% cut-off, p = 0.001 for +2/ + 3 cut-off and p = 0.004 for 20% cut-off). Finally, cytoplasmic only staining achieved higher agreement using all three cut-offs than cytoplasmic/nuclear staining and cytoplasmic/membranous staining.

Conclusions

All three cut-offs investigated achieve reasonable strength of agreement modestly decreasing inter and intra-observer variability in IHC interpretation but 10% is slightly better than 20% and +2/ + 3 cut-offs. These cut-offs have previously been used in cancer pathology and we have provided evidence that they are reproducible between practising pathologists.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings