Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Effectiveness of the induction DCS therapy, for cT4 esophageal cancer

Date

19 Dec 2015

Session

Poster presentation 1

Presenters

Shusuke Tamoto

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 42-70. 10.1093/annonc/mdv523

Authors

S. Tamoto, T. Nishimaki, H. Shimoji, H. Karimata

Author affiliations

  • 1digestive And General Surgery, University Ryukyus, 903-0213 - Okinawa/JP
More

Resources

Abstract 980

Aim/Background

The prognosis of cT4 esophageal cancer is unfavorable. We have reported that prognostic factors of cT4 esophageal cancer is a R0 resection. In a prospective cohort study evaluating the efficacy of multimodal therapy consisting of induction triplet chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy (CRT) and subsequent esophagectomy for marginally unresectable T4 esophageal cancer, 58 patients with the disease underwent 2 courses of 5 FU/doxorubicin/nedaplatin (FAN) chemotherapy, 3 courses of docetaxel/cisplatin/S1 (DCS) chemotherapy, or 40-66 Gy CRT as the induction therapy. The aim of the study was to evaluate the outcome of the 3 types of multimodal therapy in these patients, and to determine the adequate induction therapy for T4 esophageal cancer.

Methods

Of the 58 patients, 17, 29, and 12 underwent FAN chemotherapy (2002–2006), CRT (2006–2013), and DCS chemotherapy (2013 - ), respectively. The short- and long-term results were compared among these patients. In all patients, suspicious T4 site was the trachea, bronchus, or aorta with or without other additional structures.

Results

Major response of tumor to the induction therapy was observed in 35%, 69%, and 92% of patients who underwent FAN chemotherapy, CRT, and DCS chemotherapy, respectively (p = 0.013). Although manageable in all cases, the toxicity grade 3 or higher occurred in 73% of patients undergoing DCS chemotherapy, whereas that was 49 % and 59% in patients undergoing FAN chemotherapy and CRT, respectively. R0 resection rate (64%) after DCS chemotherapy was comparable to that (69%) after CRT, whereas that was 47% in patients undergoing FAN therapy. Mortality/morbidity rates after esophagectomy were 20%/50%, 4.5%/77%, and 0%/75% in patients undergoing FAN chemotherapy, CRT, and DCS chemotherapy, respectively. The 5-year survival rate after R0 esophagectomy was 38% and 62% in patients who underwent FAN chemotherapy and CRT, respectively.

Conclusions

iDCS therapy for cT4 esophageal cancer, the response rate and R0 resection rate are both high, and therefore, good remote results are expected. In addition, it recognized the effect even after CRT, it is a promising induction therapy, which aims to actively R0 resection for cT4 esophageal cancer.

Clinical trial identification

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings