Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Complementary role of the MSKCC nomogram to the AJCC system for the prediction of relapse of major salivary gland carcinoma after surgery

Date

20 Dec 2015

Session

Poster presentation 2

Presenters

Chia-Yen Hung

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 93-102. 10.1093/annonc/mdv527

Authors

C. Hung1, W. Chou1, K. Chang2, C. Lu3, M. Chen4, Y. Cheng5, K. Yeh6, C. Wang6, Y. Lin1, T. Yeh7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, 333 - Taoyuan/TW
  • 2 Otolaryngology, Head And Neck Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, 333 - Taoyuan/TW
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Chiayi, 333 - Chiayi/TW
  • 4 Radiation Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Chiayi, 333 - Chiayi/TW
  • 5 Radiology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Kaohsiung, Kaohsiung/TW
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Keelung, Keelung/TW
  • 7 Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital-Linkou, 333 - Taoyuan/TW
More

Resources

Aim/Background

Risk models to predict the recurrence of major salivary gland malignancies after surgery assist clinicians in appropriately selecting candidates for adjuvant treatment. This study aimed to externally validate the MSKCC nomogram based on an Asian cohort.

Methods

We retrospectively enrolled 149 patients who had undergone intended curative resections for major salivary gland carcinoma between 2007 and 2012. Clinicopathological parameters and long-term outcomes of our cohort were analyzed. The performance of the MSKCC nomogram and American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 7th staging system in predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) was compared.

Results

Univariate analysis followed by multivariate adjustment identified histological grading, vascular invasion, and perineural invasion as three independent prognostic factors predictive of disease recurrence. The calibration plot indicated that the MSKCC nomogram accurately estimated the recurrence in low-risk groups but tended to overestimate the recurrence in high-risk groups, compared to the actual observed events. The power to predict the 5-year recurrence-free probability did not differ between the MSKCC nomogram and the AJCC system (c-index, 0.82 vs. 0.77, p = 0.45). Importantly, when the MSKCC nomogram was combined with the AJCC system to predict the 5-year recurrence-free probability, their c-indices were 0.92, 0.90, 0.51, and 0.62 for the patients categorized with AJCC stage I, II, III, and Iva disease, respectively.

Conclusions

Although the MSKCC nomogram and AJCC staging system exhibited comparable performances in predicting recurrence risk, concurrent use of the MSKCC nomogram enabled identification of high-risk patients that were identified as having early stage disease by the AJCC system.

Clinical trial identification

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings