Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Comparison of clinical outcome in pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) and extra-pulmonary NEC

Date

19 Dec 2015

Session

Poster presentation 1

Presenters

Tomomi Kashiwada

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 40-41. 10.1093/annonc/mdv522

Authors

T. Kashiwada1, N.K. Watanabe2, K. Komiya2, N. Aragane2, S. Kimura2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Cancer Center, Saga University Hospital, 849-8501 - Saga/JP
  • 2 Division Of Hematology, Respiratory Medicine And Oncology, Saga University Hospital, 849-8501 - Saga/JP
More

Resources

Abstract 441

Aim/Background

Systematic treatment strategy for Neuroendocrine carcinoma (NEC) has not been established.Extra-pulmonary NEC is a rare and highly aggressive neoplasm for which the optimal chemotherapy remains unclear.Guidelines for treating extra-pulmonary NEC advocate the use of Platinum-based chemotherapy, although limited studies have been reported.The objective this study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of the NEC treated with chemotherapy.

Methods

NEC patients were identified from chemotherapy registries hospital charts coding and pathology coding at Saga-University from January 2011 to December 2014.Patients with metastatic or locally advanced NEC (Ki67 ≧ 20%) who received chemotherapy were selected for analysis.We defined the primary end point of the study as the identification of the benefits of the treatment that conforms to the pulmonary NEC for extra-pulmonary NEC. In all analyses, patients in the pulmonary NEC group were compared with those in the extra pulmonary NEC group.

Results

In the total of 58 patients identified, primary tumors were mainly located in the lung (75.9%) extra-pulmonary (24.1%). Median Overall survival (OS) from diagnosis was 29.6 months for all patients.6 patients (10.3%) in a localized stage underwent surgery.35 patients received palliative first-line chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Irinotecan plus cisplatin or etoposide plus cisplatin (EP) were most commonly selected for the first-line chemotherapy and 32 patients received a second-line therapy (mostly amrubicin) .First-line chemotherapy for patients with pulmonary NEC / extra-pulmonary NEC (n = 25/10) Partial response (PR) was observed 72 /40%, stable disease (SD) in 16/50% and median OS was 26.8/17.1 months (P = 0.591).

Conclusions

There was no significant difference between effects of the platinum-based chemotherapy that conforms to the pulmonary NEC for extra-pulmonary NEC, but our data show treatment outcome for extra-pulmonary NEC tended to be inferior than pulmonary NEC.Additional clinical and molecular tumor data are needed to define possible subgroups and optimal treatment strategy for this rare disease entity in order to individualize future treatment of these patients.

Clinical trial identification

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings