Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Background of patients (pts) with ALK rearranged (ALK+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and efficacy and safety of ALK inhibitors (ALK-Is) in actual clinical practice: Multicenter retrospective study

Date

20 Dec 2015

Session

Poster presentation 2

Presenters

Kentaro Ito

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2015) 26 (suppl_9): 125-147. 10.1093/annonc/mdv532

Authors

K. Ito1, H. Saiki1, T. Sakaguchi1, K. Hayashi1, Y. Nishii1, F. Watanabe1, O. Hataji1, T. Okano2, M. Naito2, H. Ibata2, A. Fujiwara3, M. Yoshida3, H. Itani4, M. Tanigawa4, H. Kobayashi5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Respiratory Centor, Matsusaka City Hospital, 515-8544 - Matsusaka/JP
  • 2 Respiratory Medicine, Mie Chuo Medical Center, Tsu/JP
  • 3 Respiratory Medicine, Mie Prefectural General Medical Center, Yokkaichi/JP
  • 4 Respiratory Medicine, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Ise/JP
  • 5 Respiratory Medicine, Suzuka General Hospital, Suzuka/JP
More

Resources

Abstract 1094

Aim/Background

Alectinib (ALC) and crizotinib CRZ) are approved for pts with ALK+ NSCLC. Although ALC 600 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) is the recommended dose worldwide, 300mg b.i.d. is used in Japan. We investigated the background of pts with ALK+ NSCLC and the efficacy and safety of ALK 300 mg b.i.d. compared with those of CRZ in the clinical settings.

Methods

We conducted a multicenter retrospective analysis to evaluate the outcome of all pts diagnosed with ALK+ NSCLC and treated with ALK-Is at five institutions in Mie, Japan. Pts characteristics, response, outcome, and toxicity were evaluated. The primary endpoint was the duration of ALK-I treatment, which reflects pts benefit in term of discontinuance due to adverse events (AEs) in actual clinical practice. Survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared with the log-rank test.

Results

We reviewed 41 pts with ALK+ NSCLC. Median age was 63 years (range, 28-89) and 51.2 % were females. 33 pts were treated with ALK inhibitors (ALK-Is); 26 pts received CRZ and 18 pts received ALC. All 26 pts in the CRZ group had no prior exposure to ALC. 10 pts in the ALC group had prior exposure to CRZ. Response rates to CRZ and ALC were 65.2% (95% CI: 42.7%-83.6%) and 76.9% (95% CI 46.2%-95.1%), respectively. Response rate to ALC after CRZ failure was 90.0% (9/10) (95% CI 55.5%-99.9%). 7 pts (26.9%) withdrew from CRZ because of AEs, including interstitial lung disease (ILD) in 2 pts, renal cysts, hypoalbuminemia and albuminuria, infection, liver dysfunction, and anorexia. Only one patient in the ALC group withdrew from ALC because of an AE (ILD). The median duration of ALK-Is treatment was 143 days (CRZ) vs. not reached (ALC) and was significantly longer for ALC (log-rank, 2-sided p = 0.047; HR = 0.408, 95% CI 0.169-0.987). Subgroup analysis of pts over 70 years of age treated with CRZ revealed that four (44.4%) discontinued CRZ; however, no statistical difference in the incidence of AEs was observed by age.

Conclusions

In this retrospective study, ALC 300 mg b.i.d. was well tolerated and significantly associated with a longer duration of treatment, and effective in pts with prior CRZ failure in clinical practice.

Clinical trial identification

Disclosure

K. Ito, H. Saiki, T. Sakaguchi, K. Hayashi, Y. Nishii, F. Watanabe, O. Hataji: reseach grant from Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, Kyorin Pharmaceutical Company, Boehringer Ingelheim. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings