Abstract 5865
Background
The 21-gene Breast Recurrence Score® (RS) is an established genomic tool to assess recurrence risk and adjuvant chemotherapy benefit in early breast cancer. The TAILORx study redefined group boundaries of the RS in node negative women. In the 668 patients of the NSABP-B14 study that formed the validation set of the RS younger age was significantly correlated with distant recurrence and tumour size trended toward significance. High tumour grade remained an independent prognostic factor beyond the RS. In the TAILORx study these higher risk groups were under-represented.
Methods
We compared clinical prognostic parameters of women in South East London with available RS with the TAILORx trial population. Retrospective case note analysis of all identified patients between 2013 and 2018 was completed. Women with nodal involvement were excluded. Descriptive statistics were used for comparison with patient characteristics of the TAILORx study.
Results
A total of 269 tests were identified. 42 were excluded for nodal involvement or incomplete clinical data, leaving 227 patients. Differences between the populations are demonstrated for all characteristics and will be presented at the meeting.Table:
263P Patient characteristic
RS | <11 | 11-25 | >26 | ALL |
N (%) | 34 (11) | 142 (67) | 51 (22) | 227 (100) |
Median age (range) | 48 (28-75) | 49 (28-74) | 53 (38-78) | 50 (28-78) |
≤50 yr % | 56 | 56 | 41 | 52 |
Premenopausal % | 59 | 64 | 47 | 59 |
Tumour size in cm Median (IQR) Mean (SD) | 2.0 (1.7-3.0) 2.6 ± 1.5 | 2.1 (1.5-3.0) 2.6 ± 1.8 | 2.2 (1.6-3.0) 2.4 ± 1.2 | 2.1 (1.6-3.0) 2.6 ± 1.6 |
Tumour grade % Low Intermediate High | 6 74 21 | 4 63 33 | 0 24 76 | 4 56 41 |
Clinical risk % Low High High (TAILORx) | 35 65 22 | 32 68 26 | 20 80 57 | 30 70 |
Conclusions
Our patients have a higher clinical risk than the TAILORx population. They are younger and have larger, higher grade cancers. This population is under-represented in the TAILORx study which was unable to exclude benefit in the ≤ 50 subset and may thus underestimate benefit from chemotherapy in our population. The current RS reporting is biased towards an older, low-risk population.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
The authors.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
C. Gousis: Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Roche. H. Kristeleit: Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony, Travel / Accommodation / Expenses: Novartis; Advisory / Consultancy, Speaker Bureau / Expert testimony: Eisai; Advisory / Consultancy: Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2840 - Effects of Aerobic and Resistance Exercise on Android:Gynoid Fat Ratio in Breast Cancer Survivors
Presenter: Christina Dieli-Conwright
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
869 - Impact of Education for Breast self examination in Rural Indian Women on Early Detection - results of POC study
Presenter: Sneha Parchuri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1951 - Breast cancer incidence and survival in renal transplant patients: 35-year experience
Presenter: Michalis Kontos
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2017 - The changing landscape of breast cancer incidence after treatment for Hodgkin’s disease
Presenter: Amelia Benjamin
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
1780 - Number of deliveries as a prognostic factor in different breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Anniina Jääskeläinen
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4650 - Effects of supervised and adapted exercise program in the quality of life and strength of breast cancer survivors: MAMA MOVE Gaia trial
Presenter: Ana Joaquim
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4962 - Study On the Socioeconomic and Clinical Factors Affecting the Proportion of Breast Conserving Surgery in Chinese Women Breast Cancer
Presenter: Jin Zhang
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5451 - Clinical decision making and multidisciplinary team meetings (MDMs) in early breast cancer. Is the agreement between planned and applied therapeutic program?
Presenter: Marco Giavarra
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
888 - The value of genetic counselling in breast cancer genetic testing and clinical management
Presenter: Vicki Kiesel
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4005 - Elderly patients in the Japanese Breast Cancer Registry
Presenter: Masataka Sawaki
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract