Abstract 3447
Background
Conflicting results on the the impact of cancer first treatment delay (FTD) on survival have been reported between several studies, and its importance has yet to be determined. We currently do not have any study in breast cancer (BC) analyzing how FTD influences the prognosis of the patients according to different inmunophenotypes. We conducted a study where we examined the relationship between survival and three periods of diagnostic-therapeutic delay, 30, 60 and 90 days.
Methods
This multicentre cohort study included BC patients from screening CAMISS PROJECT, during 2000-2006 with follow-up until 2014. Cox regression analysis, crude and multivariate, was applied to estimate risk of death. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was adjusted by FTD, stage, immunophenotypes of BC and comorbidity
Results
The study included 738 women aged 45-69 years. Median time of FTD was 58 days. First treatment aplied was surgery for all populations. 42% of BC presented as stage I and 34% stage II. 24% of patients had comorbidities. 21% expressed HER2, 80% estrogen receptors and 61% progresterone. There were 53% of Luminal A tumors, followed by 27% Luminal B, of which 10% also expressed HER2, 9% were HER2 overexpressing tumors, and 11% triple negative. In the crude analysis none of the three FDT cut-off points had a significant relationship with overall survival. Multivariate analysis adjusted for phenotypes, comorbidity and stage, showed worse prognosis tendency in DT30 and DT90, with a statistically significant level in DT60, hazard ratio [HR] 1,57; 95% IC (1,04-2,38). When we analyzed survival according to DT60 and BC subtypes there was more significant risk of death among HER2 subtype HR 2,91; 95% IC (1,63-5,21) and triple negative HR 1,90; 95% IC(1,01-3,60) comparing to Luminal A. No relationship was seen in Luminal B; Table.Table:
251P
aHR30 | aHR60 | aHR90 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
Treatment delay (days) | <30 | Ref | ||
> =30 | 1,53 (0,84-2,78) | |||
<60 | R | |||
> =60 | 1,57 (1,04-2,38) | |||
<90 | Ref | |||
> =90 | 1,72(1,00-2,95) | |||
Stage | I | Ref | Ref | Ref |
InSitu | 0,29 (0,07-1,24) | 0,29 (0,07-1,23) | 1,47 (0,89-2,44) | |
II | 1,40 (0,84-2,33) | 1,38 (0,83-2,30) | 3,01 (1,67-5,41) | |
III | 4,42 (2,66-7,35) | 4,43 (2,67-7,35) | 1,95 (1,02-3,72) | |
Fenotipe | Luminal A | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Luminal B | 1,40 (0,85-2,31) | 1,45 (0,88-2,40) | 0,29 (0,07-1,22) | |
Her2 | 2,89 (1,62-5,18) | 2,91 (1,63-5,21) | 1,38 (0,83-2,31) | |
Triple Negative | 1,96 (1,01-3,66) | 1,90 (1,01-3,60) | 4,23 (2,56-7,01) | |
Comorbidity | Absence | Ref | Ref | Ref |
Presence | 1,63 (1,06-2,52) | 1,61 (1,04-2,48) | 1,59 (1,03-2,46) |
Conclusions
Waiting 60 days to initiate treatment was associated with a significantly worse overall survivall among triple negative and HER2 BC. We consider it of importance to offer early treatment to aggressive BC subtypes.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
REDISSEC-CAMISS Group-(Research Network in Health Services in Chronic Diseases).
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
3034 - Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus trastuzumab and pertuzumab in non-metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer in real life: NEOPEARL STUDY
Presenter: Maria Agnese Fabbri
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
4772 - Real world comparison of the impact of adjuvant capecitabine in women with high-risk triple-negative breast cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Presenter: Maysa Vilbert
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5627 - Influence of age on the indication of adjuvant chemotherapy in early breast cancer using Oncotype DX. An analysis of 240 patients treated in the Institut Catala d’Oncologia (ICO) hospitals
Presenter: Sabela Recalde
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3917 - Impact of delayed neoadjuvant systemic chemotherapy on survival among breast cancer patients
Presenter: Mariana Chavez Mac Gregor
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
2246 - Clinical Confirmation of Higher Exposure to Niraparib in Tumor vs Plasma in Patients With Breast Cancer
Presenter: Laura Spring
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
581 - The rationale for the effectiveness of systemic treatment of breast cancer depending on the body weight index
Presenter: Mohammad Hojouj
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5327 - Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in HER2 non-overexpressing breast cancer subtypes
Presenter: Silvia Mihaela Ilie
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3613 - Pre-specified interim analysis of the SAFE trial (NCT2236806): a 4-arm randomized, double-blind, controlled study evaluating the efficacy and safety of cardiotoxicity prevention in non-metastatic breast cancer patients treated with anthracyclines with or without trastuzumab.
Presenter: Lorenzo Livi
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
3736 - Safety of hypofractionated whole breast irradiation after conservative surgery for patients aged less than 60 years: a multi-center comparative study.
Presenter: Icro Meattini
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract
5085 - Usefulness of NT-ProBNP as a biomarker of cardiotoxicity in breast cancer patients treated with trastuzumab
Presenter: Isabel Blancas López-Barajas
Session: Poster Display session 2
Resources:
Abstract