Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 3

3457 - Pharmacist and Nurse Led Melanoma Immunotherapy Clinic

Date

30 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 3

Presenters

Dharmisha Chauhan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v829-v835. 10.1093/annonc/mdz275

Authors

D. Chauhan, J.M.G. Larkin, S. Turajlic, P. Hughes

Author affiliations

  • Skin And Melanoma Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London/GB
More

Resources

Abstract 3457

Background

With immunotherapy (IO) being the standard of care in melanoma, over time this has led to pressures within the medical day unit (MDU), especially as other cancer algorithms have evolved incorporating IO. Main pressures include reduced capacity, increasing patient numbers leading to greater pressure on doctors and requiring greater consultation time with patients to discuss survivorship issues. To help address these issues a pharmacist and nurse (P/N) led clinic was created as a new model of care in 2017.

Methods

Melanoma patients prescribed IO are placed into the clinic and reviewed 2-4 weekly as per IO regimen. Doctors review patients 12 weekly in outpatients for scan results. To assess the benefit of the clinic the number of referrals made back to the doctor before 12 weeks were recorded. Consultations needing >10 mins to discuss survivorships issues and P/N interventions were recorded.

Results

36 patients (age 24-89 yrs) have been referred to the clinic; 33 needed IO treatment, 2 steroid weaning and 1 temozolomide patient, needing nursing support. All patients required clinical evaluation for consideration of next cycle. Doctor’s input was required for 4 patients; 2 for inpatient admission for IO toxicity (monitoring for adrenal insufficiency, diabetic ketoacidosis), 1 for a biopsy (new skin nodule), 1 (scan results). Interventions routinely made by P/N included referrals to surgeons (3), dermatologist (2), ophthalmologist (2), tissue viability nurse (2), lymphedema team (2), physiological support (2) and fitness instructor (2). All patients required survivorship support and consultations ranged from 15-45 min. Common themes which emerged included how to partake in physical activity, anxiety on stopping IO, financial burden and advice on complementary therapies. In the melanoma team patients stop IO at 2yrs. Discussion on stopping IO is explored within 3 months of stopping IO; this discussion has occurred in 18/33 patients, in which the P/N helped alleviate patient’s anxiety over this time.

Conclusions

The clinic has become embedded within the melanoma service and has helped improve MDU pressures by removing patients requiring greater holistic support. This clinic in turn has sought out survivorship issues important to melanoma patients.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings