Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Cancer-specific survival with or without adjuvant chemotherapy in high-risk stage I endometrial cancer

Date

29 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 2

Presenters

Jenny Ko

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v403-v434. 10.1093/annonc/mdz250

Authors

J. Ko1, B. Lester2, N. Le3, G. Bowering1, C. Rugayan2, A. Kumar4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Abbotsford, V2S 0C2 - Abbotsford/CA
  • 2 Radiation Oncology, BC Cancer - Abbotsford, V2S 0C2 - Abbotsford/CA
  • 3 Biostatistics, BC Cancer Research Centre, V5Z1L3 - Vancouver/CA
  • 4 Medical Oncology, BC Cancer - Surrey, V3V 1Z2 - Surrey/CA
More

Resources

Background

Controversies exist for utility of adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) in early stage high risk endometrial cancer (EC). Our study sought to evaluate overall, relapse-free and cancer-specific survivals (OS, RFS, CSS) in patients with high risk FIGO stage I EC.

Methods

Per provincial guideline, high risk stage I EC eligible for AC was defined as 1) endometrioid histology, stage IB and grade 3 or 2) non-endometrioid histology with any myometrial invasion. We identified all consecutive patients with stage I EC from 6 cancer centres in British Columbia, Canada diagnosed between 2000 and 2010. CSS was defined as time between diagnosis and death due to endometrial cancer. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate patient, disease and treatment characteristics; Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate differences in OS, RFS and CSS.

Results

Among stage I EC (n = 1426), 24 with endometrioid histology and 214 with non-endometrioid histology with high risk characteristics were identified (n = 238). Median age was 66 (range 33-91); stage IA = 196, IB = 50; grade 1=16, 2=20, 3=196; LVI+ 88. Among all high risk patients, OS (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.20-0.71, p = 0.002; median 6.3 vs 12.2 years) and RFS (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.19-0.65, p = 0.001; median 5.6 vs 12.2 years) were significantly better in patients who received AC, but CSS (RR 0.65, 95% CI 0.32-1.33, p = 0.24; median not reached in both groups) was not statistically improved although numerically favoured AC. Similarly, among non-endometrioid histology, OS (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.78, p = 0.008; median 6.4 vs 12.2 years) and RFS (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20-0.72, p = 0.03; median 5.9 vs 12.2 years) were significantly better in patients who received AC, but improvements in CSS with AC (RR 0.68, 95% CI 0.3-1.4, p = 0.32; median not reached in both groups) were not statistically significant.

Conclusions

Despite its use, there is insufficient evidence that AC reduces risk of death due to cancer in high risk stage I EC, although DSS is numerically improved in patients who received AC. Improvements in OS and RFS associated with chemotherapy may be largely attributed to other confounding factors. Future prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of contemporary AC in high risk stage I EC.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

Resources from the same session

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings