Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 3

3499 - Achieving best possible cancer treatment outcomes in care pathways through benchmarking; ABC-Benchmarking

Date

30 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 3

Presenters

Anke Wind

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v671-v682. 10.1093/annonc/mdz263

Authors

A. Wind1, M. Bessems2, R.R. van Eekeren3, C.J. Wijburg4, J. Mattson5, J. Halamkova6, M. Svoboda6, J. Oliveira7, J. Abreu de Sousa8, W.H. van Harten9

Author affiliations

  • 1 General Research, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, 6815 AD - Arnhem/NL
  • 2 Dept. Of Surgery, Jeroen Bosch hospital, 5223GZ - Den Bosch/NL
  • 3 Dept Of Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, 6815 AD - Arnhem/NL
  • 4 Dept Of Urology, Robotic Surgery, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, 6815 AD - Arnhem/NL
  • 5 Dept. Of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki/FI
  • 6 Comprehensive Cancer Care Department, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno/CZ
  • 7 Urology Clinic, IPO Porto, Porto/PT
  • 8 Breast Clinic, IPO Porto, Porto/PT
  • 9 Board Of Directors, Rijnstate Hospital Arnhem, 6815 AD - Arnhem/NL
More

Resources

Abstract 3499

Background

Care pathways are used to manage quality in healthcare and concern the organization and standardization of care processes. Benchmarking care pathways can lead to knowledge sharing, for example on topics like patient engagement and collaboration within networks. A more recent development in healthcare is the transformation from volume-based healthcare to value-based healthcare, which amongst others emphasizes the need for IPU (Integrated Practice Unit) development. The ABC-Benchmarking project is an international benchmarking project aiming to further develop the BENCH-CAN pathway benchmark, establish comparative scores on IPU development, and link outcome data to benchmark results.

Methods

The 13 step benchmarking process as developed by Van Lent et al. was used. Indicators were primarily derived from the BENCH-CAN pathway benchmark format and secondary from expert opinion. An adapted Delphi method, in which clinical experts on breast and prostate cancer provided feedback in three rounds, was used to select the final set of indicators. The indicator sets containing structure, process and outcome indicators were piloted in 5 centers. Clinical outcome indicators were collected primarily through cancer registries. Site visits were performed to clarify additional questions based on the provided data and to grasp the context of the care pathway.

Results

The final set contained 79 indicators for breast and 69 indicators for prostate cancer. Due to a difference in registration and data availability of cancer registries not all data could be collected for all centers. Differences between cancer centers were found for example in the measurement of patient reported outcomes and the status of the IPU. Aggregated and comparative data can be shown during the congress.

Conclusions

Further validating the pathway benchmark tool and adding more focus to IPU development and outcome indicators led to new knowledge on adding value for cancer patients. Examples given were optimizing care organized in care pathways for breast and prostate cancer patients. Variation in the results provided improvement opportunities for all centers. A study into patient involvement in pathway development, evaluation and improvement is also part of this project.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

The authors.

Funding

Novartis.

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings