Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Display session 2

740 - A real-world analysis of the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer with PARPIs

Date

29 Sep 2019

Session

Poster Display session 2

Topics

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Alejandra Martinez de Pinillos

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2019) 30 (suppl_5): v403-v434. 10.1093/annonc/mdz250

Authors

A. Martinez de Pinillos1, C. Anger1, L. Mendoza2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Real World & Analytics Solutions, IQVIA, NI 9JY - London/GB
  • 2 Tssu-medical Sciences, IQVIA RDS Czech Republic s.r.o., 186 00 - Prague/CZ

Resources

Login to get immediate access to this content.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 740

Background

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPIs) have received US and European regulatory approvals for the treatment of BRCA-associated ovarian cancer. The approval of PARPIs in rapid succession has resulted in a paradigm shift in the management of recurrent ovarian cancer.

Methods

2,116 ovarian cancer patients (pts) in advanced/metastatic (adv/met) lines of therapy from Jan 2016 to Oct 2018 in EU5 (France, Germany, Spain, Italy, UK) were identified within Oncology Dynamics, an IQVIA oncology-syndicated cross-sectional survey collecting anonymized patient-level data. Maintenance therapy was also investigated in 534 pts.

Results

Platinum-based regimens for the treatment of adv/met ovarian cancer pts decreased from 56% in 2017 to 50% by Oct 2018. In contrast, the use of PARPIs increased from 9% to 14%. A reduction in the administration of PARPIs was noted in all platinum-based regimens (▾15% and ▾13% in 2nd and 3rd+ lines adv/met) and in non-platinum chemotherapy (▾8% and ▾9% in 2nd and 3rd+ lines adv/met). However, in platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer pts, there has been an increase of PARPIs in 2nd and 3rd+ lines (given to 27% and 29% pts, respectively). The use in the 1st line adv/met setting has also increased by 3% (administered to 8% of pts). Prior to PARPIs, most of the pts were treated with platinum-based regimens (97%). As maintenance treatment, PARPIs have been most used in 2nd (26%) and 3rd+ line (22%) in platinum-sensitive adv/met ovarian cancer. 93% of adv/met ovarian cancer pts treated with PARPIs had an ECOG status of ≤ 1 and most suffered no comorbidities (50%). Peritoneum was the most common metastatic site (63%), followed by lymph nodes (38%). Nearly all pts had been tested for BRCA1/2 and 79% of them presented mutations. Progression was the most common reason for stopping treatment with PARPIs (72%); and anaemia, nausea, vomiting, neutropenia, and rash were the most common side effects on historic patient records.

Conclusions

PARPIs have certainly shown a meaningful impact on progression-free survival in pts with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer, without any deleterious impact on the quality of life. The use of PARPIs is rising in the platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer population in clinical practice.

Clinical trial identification

Editorial acknowledgement

Legal entity responsible for the study

IQVIA.

Funding

IQVIA.

Disclosure

A. Martinez de Pinillos: Full / Part-time employment: IQVIA C. Anger: Full / Part-time employment: IQVIA L. Mendoza: Full / Part-time employment: IQVIA

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.