Abstract 4787
Background
Comparison of options from clinical decision-support (CDS) systems and decisions made in practice may be biased towards the treating institution. In this retrospective study, bias was minimized by blinding evaluators to the source of treatment recommendations, either Watson for Oncology® (WFO®) or treatments patients received at Bumrungrad International Hospital (BIH), a user of WFO®.
Methods
Treatments given were compared to therapeutic options provided by WFO®. Treatments that were identical to WFO® “recommended” (green, acceptable) were not evaluated further. Paired treatments were evaluated independently in a blinded fashion by each oncologist before consensus ranking of each pair as either acceptable, acceptable alternatives, or unacceptable treatment. The consensus for each treatment was compared to WFO®, with WFO® “for consideration” (yellow, acceptable alternative), and “not recommended” (red, unacceptable). Chi-squared tests analyzed the association between risk factors and discordant recommendations.
Results
Of 228 treatments given to patients with lung, colon, breast and rectal cancers, 174 were identical to WFO® acceptable (green) and not evaluated further; 54 non-identical pairs were evaluated (Table). Overall, 88.6% of decisions were either the same or viewed as equally acceptable by oncologists; oncologists preferred 3.9% of BIH treatments and 4.4% of WFO treatments. In cases where reasons for discordance were provided, 70% were due to BIH oncologist preference, 20% to patient preference and 10% to WFO treatment availability. We found no association between discordant recommendations and patient age or stage of cancer.Table: 1435P
Treatments | N (%) 228 Total |
---|---|
Treatments are identical | 174 (76.3%) |
Oncologists’ Evaluations | |
Acceptable alternatives | 28 (12.3%) |
BIH Preferred | 9 (3.9%) |
WFO Preferred | 10 (4.4%) |
Both WFO and BIH-Rx unacceptable | 7 (3.1%) |
Conclusions
This blinded study suggests WFO®’s therapeutic options are at as least as good as (or are an acceptable alternative to) treatments in practice. Blinding evaluators to source of treatment may minimize bias in comparisons of CDS systems and decisions made in practice.
Clinical trial identification
Editorial acknowledgement
Legal entity responsible for the study
Bumrungrad International Hospital.
Funding
Bumrungrad International Hospital.
Disclosure
All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4096 - Patient experience and use of an intervention combining nurse-led telephone and technologies for the monitoring of oral cancer medication
Presenter: Marie Ferrua
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6042 - Harnessing nurse leadership to implement a project for electronic scheduling of chemotherapy
Presenter: Emma Masters
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3123 - Turkish Cancer Patients’ Preference for Information and Communication Technologies
Presenter: Esra ildes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6062 - Unmet Needs in Oncology Research related to radiological response evaluation: a multi-center survey in three European countries
Presenter: Sophie Nisse Durgeat
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
6109 - A program implementation to facilitate intraoperative brachytherapy between hospitals
Presenter: Marc Garcia Casellas
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
1772 - Using Mobile-Based Health Care Applications Outcomes: Mini Systematic Review
Presenter: Aydanur Aydin
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
2792 - Evaluation of an education program for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy
Presenter: Iraqi Amina
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3715 - iGestSaúde: Application for self-management of symptoms during chemotherapy treatment
Presenter: Bruno Magalhaes
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
3854 - Palliative care requirements of cancer patients and investigation of knowledge and expectations related to palliative care of the patients and their families
Presenter: Ozlem Topkaya
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract
4997 - Hospice care, what to expect? An exploration of the expectation of future hospice patients
Presenter: Merel van Klinken
Session: Poster Display session 3
Resources:
Abstract