Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

1509 - Use of primary and secondary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis for reducing incidence of neutropenia: findings from a large study in German clinical practice (PROTECT)

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Christian Kurbacher

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii603-viii640. 10.1093/annonc/mdy300

Authors

C.M. Kurbacher1, M. Schmidt2, M. Geberth3, B. Otremba4, H. Eschenburg5, P. Ramdohr6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gynecologic Center, Medizinisches Zentrum Bonn Friedensplatz, 53111 - Bonn/DE
  • 2 ., Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Mainz/DE
  • 3 ., Praxisklinik am Rosengarten, Mannheim/DE
  • 4 ., Onkologische Praxis, Oldenburg/DE
  • 5 ., Internistische Gemeinschaftspraxis Duda/Eschenburg/Wilhelm, 18273 - Güstrow/DE
  • 6 Medical Development, Amgen GmbH, 80992 - Munich/DE

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1509

Background

The EORTC guidelines recommend primary prophylaxis with G-CSF when the overall risk of febrile neutropenia (FN) is ≥ 20% (high risk [HR]) or if the chemotherapy FN risk is 10–20% (medium risk [MR]) with additional patient (pt)-related risk factors. This study assessed the acceptance of these guidelines in German routine practice.

Methods

Non-interventional study of pegfilgrastim use in pts receiving Ctx for solid tumors or lymphomas (2007–2014 in 123 German centers). Pts were >18 yrs, had breast, ovarian, gastric, prostate or lung cancer, or aggressive lymphoma, EORTC-defined FN risk ≥10%, and prophylactic pegfilgrastim use. Primary endpoint: proportion of pts receiving pegfilgrastim as primary (prior to neutropenia) or secondary (following neutropenia occurrence) prophylaxis.

Results

Data were available from 1914/2069 pts (average age 58 yrs, 79% female, 60% had breast cancer, 69% had prior tumor-related therapy and 20% prior Ctx). Of those receiving prior Ctx, 39% needed neutropenia treatment. Of the 1914 pts, pegfilgrastim was used as primary and secondary prophylaxis in 78% and 22%, respectively (primary endpoint). Primary prophylaxis was more frequent than secondary in the HR (87 vs 13% of 936 pts) and MR (73 vs 27% of 835 pts) groups. At a pt level, overall FN rate was 8% and varied across tumors: gastric 12%, breast 9%, lung 7%, lymphoma 8% and ovarian 3%. Across these tumors, the number of cycles with FN were 1.9%, 3.2%, 1.9%, 1.9%, 2.1% and 0.6%, respectively. Overall, 2% had a dose reduction or therapy switch due to FN. In breast cancer, dose reductions or therapy switches occurred in 1% of pts receiving primary prophylaxis and 3% receiving secondary prophylaxis.

Conclusions

In this study of pts receiving pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in routine German practice, the majority of HR pts with overall FN risk of > 20% were treated with primary pegfilgrastim prophylaxis in concordance with the EORTC guidelines. Primary prophylaxis with pegfilgrastim was associated with a low FN incidence and a low rate of dose reductions and treatment delays.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02178475.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Amgen.

Funding

Amgen GmBH.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

C.M. Kurbacher: Honoraria and travel expenses, advisory role: Amgen. M. Schmidt: Honoraria: Pierre-Fabre, Roche, Pfizer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Amgen, Celgene; Research grants: Pierre-Fabre; Non-financial support: Roche, Pfizer, Amgen, Celgene. H. Eschenburg: Honoraria: Roche AG; Other financial support: Bristol-Myers Squibb. P. Ramdohr: Employee and holds stock: Amgen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.