Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

3901 - Treatment sequences in metastatic renal cell carcinoma: efficacy results from the Czech registry (RENIS)

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Jindrich Finek

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii303-viii331. 10.1093/annonc/mdy283

Authors

J. Finek1, R. Demlova2, K. Kopeckova3, T. Buchler4, B. Melichar5, J. Prausova3, A. Poprach6, T. Hrnciarova7, T. Mlcoch7, T. Dolezal7

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology And Radiotherapy, Teaching Hospital Pilsen and Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen, Charles University, 30133 - Plzen/CZ
  • 2 Pharmacology Department,, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 65653 - Brno/CZ
  • 3 Oncology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Motol University Hospital, 15006 - Prague/CZ
  • 4 Oncology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and Thomayer Hospital, 140 59 - Prague/CZ
  • 5 Oncology, University Hospital Olomouc, 77520 - Olomouc/CZ
  • 6 Department Of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, 65653 - Brno/CZ
  • 7 Iheta, Institute of Health Economics and Technology Assessment, Prague/CZ

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 3901

Background

Efficacy data of treatment sequences in mRCC are rare. In the Czech Republic, data on efficacy and safety of all targeted therapies for mRCC are collected in the RENIS patient registry. Thus, RENIS provides data from the real-world clinical practice. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes of selected treatment sequences in mRCC while adjusting for differences in patient characteristics using inverse propensity score weighting method (IPWS).

Methods

Data of mRCC patients treated using most common treatment sequences were collected in RENIS between 06/2007 and 02/2018. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were evaluated. Baseline characteristics were balanced using IPWS. The propensity score was evaluated with nominal logistic model to balance Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status, time from diagnosis to first treatment, nephrectomy, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) score, and age. Median and confidence intervals (CI) were derived from IPWS weighted Kaplan-Meier curves that were compared using log-rank test.

Results

Overall, 745 patients in five treatment sequences were included and analysed. Differences in OS were significant (p < 0.001) with sunitinib→axitinib→everolimus and sunitinib→axitinib sequences associated with improved survival over other sequences. These differences could be also linked to time when these drugs were introduced. PFS did not differ between sunitinib and pazopanib used as first line treatments (p = 0.44) but the PFS in the second line differed significantly (p = 0.035) (Table). Table: Results of OS and PFS for examined sequences computed using inverse propensity score weighting. Sunitinib → Axitinib → Everolimus sequence should be assessed with caution due to immortal time bias.Table: 892P

ParameterTreatment sequencenMedian95% CI for medianp
Lower limitUpper limit
OS (months)Sunitinib → Everolimus31226.323.829.0<0.001
Sunitinib → Axitinib15447.631.350.5
Sunitinib → Axitinib → Everolimus11446.044.750.9
Pazopanib → Everolimus7432.930.933.8
Pazopanib → Sunitinib9127.226.728.8
PFS 1st line (months)Sunitinib58010.29.810.80.440
Pazopanib1659.28.510.0
PFS 2nd line (months)Sunitinib → Everolimus3125.85.16.30.035
Sunitinib → Axitinib2686.46.07.1
Pazopanib → Everolimus745.14.15.5
Pazopanib → Sunitinib915.35.17.1

Conclusions

Improved outcomes were associated with sequences using second-line axitinib over those using second-line sunitinib or everolimus in a cohort of patients from a national registry.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Jindrich Finek.

Funding

Value Outcomes.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

J. Finek: Honoraria: Amgen, BMS, Roche, Bayer, Teva, MSD, Merck, Sanofi, Pierre Fabre. R. Demlova: Honoraria for lectures: Bayer. K. Kopeckova: Honoraria for lectures: Novartis; Travel grants: Pfizer, Bayer. T. Buchler: Honoraria for advisory boards and/or lectures: Novartis, Pfizer, Bayer, Roche. B. Melichar: Honoraria for advisory boards and/or lectures: Novartis, Pfizer, Glaxo Smith Kline, Roche, Bayer. A. Poprach: Honoraria for lectures: Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche, Bayer. T. Hrnciarova, T. Mlcoch, T. Dolezal: Employee of Value Outcomes. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.