Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Basic science, Endocrine tumours, Gastrointestinal tumours - colorectal & non-colorectal, Head and neck cancer (excluding thyroid), Melanoma and other skin tumours, Neuroendocrine tumours, Thyroid cancer, Tumour biology & pathology

1713 - The Efficacy and Safety of (Neo)Adjuvant Therapy for Gastric Cancer: A Network Meta-analysis

Date

21 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Basic science, Endocrine tumours, Gastrointestinal tumours - colorectal & non-colorectal, Head and neck cancer (excluding thyroid), Melanoma and other skin tumours, Neuroendocrine tumours, Thyroid cancer, Tumour biology & pathology

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Tom van den Ende

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii205-viii270. 10.1093/annonc/mdy282

Authors

T. van den Ende1, E. Ter Veer1, M. Machiels2, R.M.A. Mali1, F.A. Abe Nijenhuis1, L.D. Waal1, M. Laarman1, S.S. Gisbertz3, M.C.C.M. Hulshof2, M.G.H. van Oijen1, H.W.M. van Laarhoven1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), 1105AZ - Amsterdam/NL
  • 2 Radiotherapy, Academic Medical Center (AMC), 1105AZ - Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Surgery, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam/NL

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1713

Background

Alternatives in treatment-strategies exist for resectable gastric cancer treated with curative intent including: perioperative chemotherapy, adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant chemotherapy. Our aims were (1) to assess the benefit of perioperative, neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment-strategies and (2) to determine the optimal adjuvant regimen for gastric cancer treated with curative intent.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and ASCO/ESMO conferences were searched up to August 2017 for randomized controlled trials on curative treatment for resectable gastric cancer. We performed two network-meta-analyses (NMA). NMA-1 compared perioperative, neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies only if there was a direct comparison. NMA-2 compared different adjuvant regimens with chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy, after curative resection. Overall-survival (OS) and disease-free-survival (DFS) were analyzed using random-effects NMA on the hazard ratio (HR)-scale and calculated as combined HRs and 95% credible intervals (95%CrIs).

Results

NMA-1 consisted of 9 direct comparisons between strategies for OS (14 studies, n = 4,187 patients). NMA-2 consisted of 16 direct comparisons between adjuvant chemotherapy/chemoradiotherapy regimens for OS (37 studies, n = 10,761) and 14 for DFS (30 studies, n = 9,714 patients). Compared to taxane-containing-perioperative-chemotherapy, surgery-alone (HR = 0.58, 95%CrI = 0.38-0.91) and perioperative-chemotherapy (HR = 0.79, 95%CrI = 0.58-1.15) were inferior in OS. Compared to surgery-alone neoadjuvant chemotherapy was non-significant (HR = 1.00, 95%CrI = 0.67-1.47). After curative-resection, the doublet oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine (for one-year) was the most efficacious adjuvant regimen in OS (HR = 0.47, 95%CrI = 0.28-0.80). The addition of radiotherapy to chemotherapy did not improve OS and DFS.

Conclusions

For resectable gastric cancer treated with curative intent, (1) taxane-containing perioperative-chemotherapy is the preferred treatment strategy; and (2) adjuvant oxaliplatin-fluoropyrimidine is the optimal regimen after curative resection.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Academic Medical Center.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

S.S. Gisbertz: Consultant: Medtronic; Unrestricted research grant: Olympus. M.G.H. van Oijen: Unrestricted research grants: Bayer, Lilly, Merck Serono, Nordice, Roche. H.W.M. van Laarhoven: Consultant: Philips, Celgene, Lilly, Nordic; Unrestricted research funding: Philips, Bayer, BMS, Celgene, Lilly, Merck Serono, MSD, Nordic, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.