Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

2357 - Survival Difference Between Microscopically Confirmed and Microscopically Non-Confirmed Cancers

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology

Tumour Site

Presenters

Mohamed Gouda

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii562-viii575. 10.1093/annonc/mdy297

Authors

M.A. Gouda

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Clinical Oncology, Faculty of Medicine - Menoufia University, 32511 - Shebin El Kom/EG

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2357

Background

Cancer is mainly diagnosed by histopathology, but some complex situations may provoke physicians’ desire to avoid biopsy. This is particularly important when cancer diagnosis can be made based on other less accurate methods like radiological findings or elevated tumor markers e.g. suspicious ovarian mass with elevated CA125. However, data about these cases treated based on diagnosis “prediction” rather than accurate definition of histopathology are lacking. In this study, survival is compared between cases with microscopic confirmation of diagnosis and those diagnosed with other methods. This is presented for all types of cancer but with particular focus on four main tumors where other modalities for diagnosis may be appealing.

Methods

Data were obtained using SEER*Stat version 8.3.5 (SEER 18 Regs Nov 2017 Submission). Only cases diagnosed between 2001 and 2010 were included. Observed survival was calculated using SEER*Stat where other data analysis including Kaplan Meier analysis was made using SPSS.

Results

Microscopic confirmation (MC) was the mainstay for diagnosis in most of included cases (n = 3594344; 94.2%). In the remaining group (non-microscopically confirmed (NMC) diagnosis, n = 222907; 5.8%), radiography was used in 46% (n = 102401). Clinical diagnosis, positive laboratory test/marker, and direct visualization were used in 11.8%, 5.2%, and 2.7 respectively. There was a significant survival difference between MC and NMC that was consistent in prostate, ovarian, liver, and pancreatic cancer as well as in other types of malignancies (p < 0.05). The table shows the 5-years observed survival and 95% CI for different types of cancer in the two groups.Table: 1600P

5-years observed survival
MCNMC
Prostate85.3% (85.2-85.4)26.6% (25.8-27.5)
Ovary44.1% (43.6-44.6)10.9% (9.8-12)
Liver18.1% (17.7-18.5)9.6% (9.2-10.1)
Pancreas6.5% (6.3-6.7)2.6% (2.3-2.9)
Others67.4% (57.3-57.4)14.7% (14.4-14.9)
All60.5% (60.6-60.6)13.7% (13.5-13.8)

Conclusions

Microscopic confirmation should be regarded as the only accurate method for diagnosis of cancer. Depending on other diagnosis methods may have a strong detrimental effect on survival. More studies needs to address possible explanations for these findings and potential implications on management.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Mohamed Alaa Gouda.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.