Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

1730 - Safety analysis of proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim in Phase I and Phase III studies

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Supportive Care and Symptom Management

Tumour Site

Presenters

Nadia Harbeck

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii603-viii640. 10.1093/annonc/mdy300

Authors

N. Harbeck1, J. Wang2, G. Otto3, A. Krendyukov4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Breast Cancer Dept. Ob & Gyn, And Ccclmu, University of Munich, 81377 - Munich/DE
  • 2 Biostatistics, Sandoz Inc., Princeton/US
  • 3 Clinical research, Hexal AG, Holzkirchen/DE
  • 4 Medical Oncology/hematology, Hexal AG, Holzkirchen/DE

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1730

Background

Granulocyte colony-stimulating factors (G-CSFs), including filgrastim and its long-acting form pegfilgrastim, are widely used to prevent chemotherapy-induced neutropenia in patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy. Bone pain is the most frequently reported adverse event (AE) associated with G-CSF. In cancer patients receiving pegfilgrastim, bone pain incidence ranges from 25–38%, compared with 52–84% in healthy volunteers (HVs).1 This study compares safety data for Sandoz proposed biosimilar pegfilgrastim in Phase I and III studies.

Methods

Three studies were included: 103, a single-dose, randomized, double-blind, crossover phase I study in HVs receiving proposed biosimilar (n = 92) or reference pegfilgrastim (n = 92)2 and 2 randomized, double-blind Phase III confirmatory studies (PROTECT13 and 24) in breast cancer (BC) patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy (≤6 cycles) receiving proposed biosimilar (PROTECT1: n = 159; PROTECT2: n = 155) or reference pegfilgrastim (PROTECT1: n = 157; PROTECT2: n = 153). Results were compared for a single dose of pegfilgrastim in 103, and for 1st treatment cycle in PROTECT1 and 2.

Results

Differences in baseline characteristics between 103 and PROTECT included younger age, lower BMI and inclusion of men in 103 (Table). Treatment related bone pain was reported by 58% (biosimilar) and 53% (reference) in 103; in 4.4% (biosimilar) and 5.1% (reference) in PROTECT1, and 4.5% (biosimilar) and 8.5% (reference) in PROTECT2. AEs were generally mild in 103 and mild/moderate in PROTECT.Table: 1698P

Study 1032PROTECT12PROTECT23

Baseline characteristics

Age, mean (SD)

Proposed biosimilar

26.7 (7.35)

49.9 (9.53)

48.8 (10.50)

Reference

50.5 (10.87)

49.1 (10.07)

Female gender, n (%)

Proposed biosimilar

67 (36)

159 (100)

155 (100)

Reference

157 (100)

153 (100)

BMI, mean (SD)

Proposed biosimilar

23.9 (2.17)

27.5 (5.67)

26.6 (5.77)

Reference

27.4 (5.60)

26.5 (5.13)

Safety

Bone pain, n (%)

Proposed biosimilar

102 (58)

7 (4.4)

7 (4.5)

Reference

94 (53)

6 (3.8)

13 (8.5)

RR (CI)

1.10 (0.93 - 1.30)

1.15 (0.40 - 3.35)

0.53 (0.22 -1.30)

Headache, n (%)

Proposed biosimilar

100 (57)

2 (1.3)

3 (1.9)

Reference

99 (56)

3 (1.9)

3 (2.0)

RR (CI)

1.02 (0.87 - 1.20)

0.66 (0.11 - 3.89)

0.99 (0.20 - 4.81)

BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; RR, relative risk; SD, standard deviation.

Conclusions

Bone pain was similar with proposed biosimilar and reference pegfilgrastim, in studies of BC patients and HVs. Pivotal Phase I and Phase III studies support the matching safety and efficacy of Sandoz proposed biosimilar and reference pegfilgrastim. References: 1. Lambertini et al Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2014;89:112–28. 2. Nakov et al Cancer Res 2018;78:P3-14-10. 3. Harbeck et al Future Oncol 2016;12:1359–7. 4. Blackwell et al Oncologist 2016;21:789–4.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany.

Funding

Hexal AG, Holzkirchen, Germany.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Caroline McGown, Spirit Medical Communications.

Disclosure

N. Harbeck: Advisory and consulting services: Amgen, Hexal. AG. J. Wang: Employee: Sandoz Inc. G. Otto, A. Krendyukov: Employee: Hexal AG.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.