Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

1563 - Reproducibility of the mRECIST criteria for the assessment of HCC treated by anti- VEGFR therapy: Impact of readers’ expertise

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Topics

Tumour Site

Hepatobiliary Cancers

Presenters

Hubert Beaumont

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii14-viii57. 10.1093/annonc/mdy269

Authors

H. Beaumont1, S. Egels2, N. Faye1, C. Klifa3, A. Iannessi4, E. Bonnard5, O. Lucidarme2

Author affiliations

  • 1 R&d, MEDIAN Technologies, 6560 - Valbonne/FR
  • 2 Radiology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpetriere, 75651 - Paris/FR
  • 3 R&d, Median Technologies, 06560 - Vabonne/FR
  • 4 Radiology, Hopital Antoine Lacassagne, Nice/FR
  • 5 Radiology, Hopital Pasteur, Nice/FR

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1563

Background

The imaging criteria mRECIST, which was initially introduced to assess the efficacy of HCC vascular bed destruction induced by TACE, is now often used to assess subtler vascular effects induced by anti-VEGFR therapy. However, variability of mRECIST assessment has been only partially investigated. In this study, we evaluated the inter-reader variability and its sources in the mRECIST assessment of treatment response for HCC treated by anti-VEGFR drugs.

Methods

A subset of 41 advanced HCC tumors in 24 patients treated by anti-VEGFR drugs were selected from a phase I/II nalysedre study (the original study). These data were retrospectively reviewed according to mRECIST criteria by 3 mRECIST non-expert radiologists each having different levels of experience. Each liver lesion measurement was hand drawn using an electronic caliper. Results from these 3 radiologists were then compared to those extracted by an mRECIST expert at the time of the original study. The precision of measurements among the 3 non-experts and between the expert and the 3 non-experts were nalysed by assessing bias and standard deviation (SD) using the Bland-Altman method. The agreement of readers’ responses was assessed using the Kappa coefficient statistic. The causes of discrepancies were nalysed.

Results

Among the 3 non-experts, SD of measurements ranged [24.9%; 36.3%] and the Kappa coefficients were moderate 0.41 [0.28; 0.55]. SD in measurements of expert versus non-experts ranged [33.2%; 41.1%] and Kappa coefficients were poor 0.20 [0.06; 0.35]. Pooling the four readers together, the rate of discrepancy at declaring either Progressive Disease (PD) or Partial Response (PR) per patient was identical at 41.7% (10/24). The main cause of discrepancy at declaring PD came from the complexity of HCC enhancement patterns and the poor definition of tumors boundaries. Discrepancies at detecting PR came from the reader variability at selecting only the viable part or the entire liver tumor.

Conclusions

When used by mRECIST non-experts to assess the subtle vascular effect induced on HCC by anti-VEGFR therapy, mRECIST appears to lack reproducibility. It is therefore important when using mRECIST to require specific training to reduce readers variability.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Median Technologies.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

H. Beaumont, N. Faye, C. Klifa: Employee: Median Technologies. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.