Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

3098 - Randomized trial of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) + enzalutamide (Arm A) versus ADT + bicalutamide (Arm B) in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC)

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Ulka Vaishampayan

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii271-viii302. 10.1093/annonc/mdy284

Authors

U.N. Vaishampayan1, L. Heilbrun2, P. Monk3, G. Sonpavde4, S. Tejwani5, E.I. Heath6, J. Fontana6, S. Chinni6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Institute, 48201-2013 - Detroit/US
  • 2 Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Center, 48098 - Detroit/US
  • 3 Division Of Medical Oncology, The Ohio State University James Cancer Hospital, columbus/US
  • 4 Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, 02215 - Boston/US
  • 5 Oncology, Henry Ford Hospital, Detroit/US
  • 6 Oncology, Karmanos Cancer Center, Detroit/US

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 3098

Background

The addition of abiraterone or docetaxel has shown overall survival (OS) benefit in mHSPC. There is adequate rationale for clinical efficacy of enzalutamide and ADT combination in mHSPC. We compared the combination of enzalutamide (Arm A) or bicalutamide (Arm B), each with ADT in mHSPC.

Methods

The primary endpoint was the seven month PSA remission (SMPR), with PSA nadir of < 4 ng/ml, as this is an accepted surrogate for overall survival (OS) outcomes. Secondary endpoints were toxicities, biochemical and radiologic progression free survival (PFS), and OS. Stratification was by presence of bone pain (yes/no) and race; (AA or other). PSA was monitored monthly for first 7 months and then every 3 months. Metastatic site biopsies were mandatory pretherapy and optional post therapy.

Results

71 men; 29 African American (AA),41 Caucasian and 1 Asian were enrolled. The median age was 67 years (range 46-87 years) and median baseline PSA was 56.3 ng/ml in Arm A (4.2- 10,431 ng/ml) and 60 (4.9-12,030 ng/ml) in Arm B. 26 pts (39%) had bone pain and 37(52%) had extensive disease. Predominant grade 3+ adverse events on Arm A were: Hypertension (13%), infection (7%), and syncope (7%) and on Arm B were: Hypertension (21%), Fatigue (7%), and Hematuria (7%). No seizures were noted. PSA nadir < 4ng/ml at month 7 was achieved in 29/31 (94%) pts in arm A and 16/24 (67%) pts in arm B. 53% on arm A and 43% on Arm B continue to maintain PSA< 4 ng/ml. 4 (11%) deaths have occurred on enzalutamide arm as compared to 13 (37.1%) deaths on Arm B. Among AA patients, SMPR was 100% on Arm A and 46% on Arm B. 53 (75%) biopsy samples had tumor tissue available. TMPRSS-ERG fusion gene and CXCR4 expression and androgen biosynthetic enzyme levels were determined in metastatic biopsies. Patients with low copy number of ERG had an increased likelihood of SMPR (19/20 or 95%) as compared to high copy number (14/20 or 70%).

Conclusions

Early enzalutamide use in mHSPC improved PSA remission rates and has the potential to subsequently improve OS outcomes High ERG copy number was associated with decreased SMPR. This is the first randomized trial to report efficacy results of the combination of ADT and enzalutamide compared with ADT and bicalutamide in mHSPC.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Karmanos Cancer Center.

Funding

Astellas Inc.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

U.N. Vaishampayan: Research support, consulting: Astellas Inc. P. Monk, G. Sonpavde, S. Chinni: Research support: Astellas Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.