Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

4253 - Prevalence and clinical implications of Mismatch Repair (MMR) deficiency in unselected endometrial cancer (EC) patients

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Endometrial Cancer

Presenters

Cecilia Orbegoso Aguilar

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii332-viii358. 10.1093/annonc/mdy285

Authors

C.M.A. Orbegoso Aguilar1, K. Vroobel2, S. Lalondrelle1, A. Taylor3, M. Nobbenhuis3, A. Attygalle2, S. Banerjee4, A. George1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Gynae-oncology Unit, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London/GB
  • 2 Histopathology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London/GB
  • 3 Gynaecology, Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SW3 6JJ - London/GB
  • 4 Gynaecology, The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust in Chelsea, SW3 6JJ - London/GB

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4253

Background

Endometrial cancer (EC) is the most common gynaecological malignancy worldwide. The TCGA data suggested up to 30% of EC pts have a MMR deficient (MMRd) tumours, however the exact concordance of this with the presence of a germline mutation (Lynch syndrome) in an unselected population is unclear. Lynch-associated tumours appear to have a better prognosis, however the implications for prognosis and survival in all MMRd tumours are less known.

Methods

396 pts with primary endometrial cancer, treated at RMH were evaluated for MMR proteins by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Tumours with loss of at least one protein were considered MMRd, those with intact expression were MMR proficient (MMRp). Clinico-pathological characteristics and survival data was collected from electronic records. Progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed using Kaplan Meier and log-rank tests.

Results

Of 396 samples tested to date, 29% (114 pts) were MMRd. Frequencies of IHC MMR loss of expression were: MLH1/PMS2 loss: 80, MSH2/MSH6 loss: 10, MSH6 loss: 12, PMS2 loss: 9, other patterns: 3. Germline testing has been completed in 37% (42 pts) thus far; 14pts had a concordant germline mutation: MLH1 (2/25), MSH2 (3/7), MSH6 (7/8), PMS2 (2/2) respectively. Mean age varied significantly, at 66 yrs (MMRd), 65yrs (MMRp) and 58 yrs (Lynch mutation carriers, LS) p = 0.022: as did mean BMI: 33 (MMRd), 26 (LS) and 36 (MMRp), p = 0.023. Stage at diagnosis did not differ significantly between the groups but MMRd and LS patients were significantly more likely to have LVSI than MMRp (p = 0.01), and to be high EORTC risk (p = 0.006). OS for the entire cohort was 160mths (75-244.9) and PFS was 51.6mths (32.4-70.7). MMRd pts had a shorter OS (96.4mths, 95%CI 65.7 – 127) than MMRp (160mo, 54.9 – 265) and a shorter PFS median PFS 41.4mo (IC 95% 18.9– 64) vs 51.6mo (IC 95% 30- 72), p.021].

Conclusions

Almost one in three EC tumours are MMRd, with concordance between IHC loss and presence of a germline mutation varying by gene. Those with somatically derived MLH1/PMS2 loss may have a poorer prognosis, and as a group may potentially benefit from checkpoint inhibitors. Further exploration of the clinical correlations and outcome with MMR status is warranted.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.