Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

6056 - Patients’ and partners’ views of treatment and care provided for metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the UK

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Psychosocial Aspects of Cancer

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Susan Catt

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii557-viii561. 10.1093/annonc/mdy296

Authors

S.L. Catt1, L. Matthews2, H. Payne3, M.D. Mason4, V. Jenkins5

Author affiliations

  • 1 Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education In Cancer (shore-c), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, BN1 9PX - Brighton/GB
  • 2 Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education In Cancer (shore-c), Brighton and Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex, Brighton/GB
  • 3 Oncology, University College London Hospital UCLH NHS Foundation Trust, NW1 2PG - London/GB
  • 4 Velindre Cancer Centre, Velindre Hospital, CF14 2TL - Cardiff/GB
  • 5 Shore-c, BSMS, BN1 9RX - Brighton/GB

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 6056

Background

Appraisals of information needs, expectations and experiences of treatment in prostate cancer have highlighted the lack of relevant data in advanced disease. We report interview data from the EXperiences of TREatment and Quality Of Life of men with mCRPC study (EXTREQOL). It aimed to examine factors driving treatment decision-making from the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals and gather data on the impact of treatments on quality of life (QOL).

Methods

A prospective longitudinal mixed-methods observational design was employed. This included semi-structure interviews conducted with patients and their partners, in-person or by phone, at baseline =within 14 days of starting a systemic treatment (any line) for mCRPC and after 3 months of treatment. Topics explored included experiences of treatment decisions, information provision, what assisted decision-making and how perceived benefits and harms of treatment affected patients’ and families’ lives.

Results

Thirty three men (56-89yrs) and their female partners (54-79yrs) from 15 UK centres participated. They believed treatment aimed to delay progression (>75%), improve QOL (33%), alleviate pain (≈12%) and extend life (15% -patients, 36% -partners). ≈50% made a joint treatment decision with the doctor and 39% had as long as they needed to decide. The worst symptom most frequently identified was pain (46% -patients, 33% -partners). At baseline and 3 months (50% and 67% respectively) did not need to discuss pain control, those that did received “very/fairly” useful information. At baseline fatigue, nausea/vomiting and diarrhoea were the worst anticipated or experienced side-effects (SEs). The worst SE at 3 months was fatigue, 33% experienced unexpected SEs and 52% sought help for SEs. 75% had helpful SE discussions, 85% received written information and internet searching about SEs was common (33% -patients, 55% -partners). Only 50% had opportunity to talk with a specialist nurse and 50% accessed other supportive services.

Conclusions

More help to manage pain and other symptoms is required. Dedicated clinics maybe warranted, better specialist nurse access and earlier palliative care links would help to optimise symptom control.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Brighton & Sussex Medical School, University of Sussex.

Funding

Sanofi Aventis.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

H. Payne: Honoraria for advisory boards, travel expenses, consultant: AstraZeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Sanofi Aventis, Takeda, Amgen, Ipsen, Ferring, Sandoz, Novartis; Work support: UCLH/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre. M. Mason: Scientific expert: Ellipsis Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.