Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

4738 - Patient reported outcomes after the treatment of early stage non-small cell lung cancer by stereotactic body radiotherapy compared to surgery.

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Presenters

Leonie Alberts

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii483-viii487. 10.1093/annonc/mdy290

Authors

L. Alberts1, H.B. Wolff2, E.A. Kastelijn1, F.J. Lagerwaard3, S. Senan3, S.Y. El Sharouni4, F.M.N.H. Schramel1, V.M.H. Coupe2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Pulmonology, St. Antonius Ziekenhuis, 3435 CM - Nieuwegein/NL
  • 2 Epidemiology And Biostatistics, Vrije University Medical Centre (VUMC), 1081 HV - Amsterdam/NL
  • 3 Radiation oncology, Vrije University Medical Centre (VUMC), 10811 |HZ - Amsterdam/NL
  • 4 Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, 3584 CX - Utrecht/NL

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4738

Background

As survival seems to be equal after either stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) or surgery for patients with stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), treatment impact on the quality of life (QoL) after is essential for well-informed decision making. After a surgical resection, deterioration of QoL is often observed in the early post-treatment period, whereas QoL is reported to be maintained after SBRT. The aim of this study is to compare QoL in the first year after SBRT and surgery.

Methods

QoL was assessed by using the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ-C30) and the lung cancer-specific supplementary questionnaire (QLQ-LC13) at baseline and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Two prospectively collected databases of patients with clinically proven stage I NSCLC, from two large hospitals in the Netherlands, were pooled (n = 306; 256 patients were treated with SBRT and 41 patients with surgery). This observational study design is susceptible to selection bias. To correct for confounding, propensity-scores were calculated using forward stepwise logistic regression, to be selected for surgical treatment. For the final model, age, dichotomized ECOG score and FEV1% predicted scores were selected.

Results

The 41 surgical patients were matched to 41 SBRT patients on propensity score with a 1:1 ratio. At baseline, patients in the surgery group report a lower health related-QoL compared to patients in the SBRT group. However, during the first year after treatment, no clinical meaningful differences in social-, role, physical, emotional and cognitive domains were observed between patients treated using either modality. Furthermore, no clinical meaningful differences in QLQ-LC13 scores (dyspnea, pain, fatigue) after treatment were observed.

Conclusions

This study comparing a matched cohort, revealed no clinical significant differences in QoL following either SBRT or surgery for an early stage NSCLC.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Leonie Alberts and Harold Wolff.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

H.B. Wolff, V.M.H. Coupe: Research funding: Novartis. Novartis Pharma B.V. was not involved in the data collection, data analysis, or reporting. F.J. Lagerwaard: Honoraria, Speaker's bureau: Viewray inc USA. S. Senan: Honoraria, Consulting/advisory role company: Lilly Oncology, AstraZeneca; Research funding: Varian Medical systems. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.