Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

5208 - No effect of length time bias on the genomic risk in ER+ HER2- Stage I-IIA Breast Cancer (BC) patients according to diagnosis in a screening programme: An exploratory analysis

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Cancer Prevention

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Ines Gonzalez Barrallo

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii562-viii575. 10.1093/annonc/mdy297

Authors

I. Gonzalez Barrallo1, J.A. Perez Fidalgo1, J. Ramirez2, O. Burgues3, J.V. Sorlí4, O. Portoles2, C. Hernando1, D. Salas5, A. Lluch6

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 - Valencia/ES
  • 2 Department Of Public Health, University of Valencia, 46010 - Valencia/ES
  • 3 Pathological Anatomy, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia, 46010 - Valencia/ES
  • 4 Preventive Medicine And Ciber Fisiopatología De La Obesidad Y Nutrición, Universitat de València, 46010 - Valencia/ES
  • 5 Area Of Cancer And Public Health, Research Center in Public Health - Centro Superior de Investigación en Salud Publica (CSISP), 46010 - Valencia/ES
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia. INCLIVA.CIBERONC Spain, 46010 - Valencia/ES

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 5208

Background

Length time bias is a form of selection bias that lead to the perception that screened patients have better outcome as more indolent tumors are diagnosed during screening. However, tumors diagnosed in the interval between mammographys or detected by symptom onset are likely more aggressive. The aim was to analyze using a genomic platform if unscreened tumors were more agresive than screened ones in a homogeneous cohort not affected by stage or subtype.

Methods

Since 2014 BC pts with T1-T2 N0-N1mic tumors and/or high ki67 are selected for genomic platform-based risk assessment in order to guide adjuvant treatment. We performed an exploratory retrospective cohort study in a single institution between 2014 and 2018 in operated stage I-IIA BC pts with ER and/or PR + who underwent an Oncotype risk assessment before deciding adjuvant therapy. Results of the Recurrence score (RS) were compared according to the type of diagnosis of breast cancer as 1) Screened: Diagnosis during screening (when diagnosed occurred during a foreseen mammography visit) and 2) Unscreened: Diagnosis occurred outside screening (in an interval between mammographys or by symptom onset).

Results

105 pts were included. Median age was 56.4 y (45.2-74.6 y). All patients were ER + (range 50-100%), HER2- and grade was I (12.4%) II (82,9%) or III (4.8%). Median tumor size was 13.7 mm (4-45). 89.5% were N0 and 10.5% N1mic. 68 pts (64.8%) were in the screened and 37 (35.3%) in the unscreened group. Foreseen adjuvant treatment was changed according to Oncotype results in 24.8% patients. Median RS was 18.2 (range 3-46). According to RS risk categories 81% were classified as low , 9.5% as intermediate and 9.5% as high risk. Median RS was 17.6 in the screened vs 19.2 in the unscreened group, these differences were not significant (p = 0.34). Differences by RS categories were also not significant (Chi square p = 0.67 for two categories low vs intermediate/high risk with a RR 0.92 (0.62-1.38) and p = 0.2 for three categories).

Conclusions

No risk differences according to RS was seen between screened vs unscreened patients. These suggest that length time bias in a cohort not affected by stage or subtype might have mínimum impact on screening outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia. INCLIVA.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.