Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2

2936 - nab-Paclitaxel + Carboplatin Induction Followed by nab-Paclitaxel Maintenance in Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results From the ABOUND.sqm Study

Date

21 Oct 2018

Session

Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy

Tumour Site

Presenters

David Spigel

Authors

D.R. Spigel1, R.M. Jotte2, S. Ponce Aix3, L. Gressot4, D. Morgensztern5, M. McCleod6, M.A. Socinski7, D. Daniel8, O. Juan-Vidal9, E.S. Kim10, H.J. West11, T. Chen12, R. Bhore12, T.J. Ong12, C. Gridelli13, M. Thomas14

Author affiliations

  • 1 Chief Scientific Officer, Sarah Cannon Research Institute, 37203 - Nashville/US
  • 2 Medical Oncology / Hematology, Rocky Mountain Cancer Centers, Denver/US
  • 3 Medical Oncology, Unidad de Investigación Clínica de Cáncer Pulmón H12O-CNIO, 28041 - Madrid/ES
  • 4 Medical Oncology, North Cypress Cancer Center, Cypress/US
  • 5 Medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 63110 - St. Louis/US
  • 6 Medical Oncology, Florida Cancer Specialists, Fort Myers/US
  • 7 Medical Oncology, Florida Hospital Cancer Institute, 32803 - Orlando/US
  • 8 Medical Oncology, Tennessee Oncology, Chattanooga/US
  • 9 Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitari i Politécnic La Fe, Valencia/ES
  • 10 Medical Oncology, Levine Cancer Institute, Atrium Health, Charlotte/US
  • 11 Medical Oncology, Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle/US
  • 12 Oncology, Celgene Corporation, Summit/US
  • 13 Medical Oncology, S.G. Moscati Hospital, Avellino/IT
  • 14 Medical Oncology, Internistische Onkologie der Thoraxtumoren, Thoraxklinik im Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Translational Lung Research Center Heidelberg (TLRC-H), Member of the German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Heidelberg/DE

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2936

Background

Demonstrated benefit with maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with squamous NSCLC remains an unmet need. In a subset of pts with advanced squamous NSCLC from a large phase 3 trial, nab-P/C demonstrated a significantly higher improvement in the primary endpoint, overall response rate (ORR; 41% vs 24%; P < 0.001), vs P/C. The ABOUND.sqm study investigated induction nab-P/C followed by nab-P maintenance for these pts.

Methods

Pts with treatment-naive, advanced squamous NSCLC received 4 cycles of induction nab-P 100 mg/m2 on d 1, 8, and 15 + C AUC 6 on d 1 (21-d cycles). Pts not progressing after 4 cycles were randomized 2:1 to maintenance nab-P 100 mg/m2 on d 1 and 8 of each 21-d cycle + best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization into the maintenance part of the study was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), and ORR.

Results

Of the 420 pts treated in the induction phase, 202 were randomized to maintenance nab-P + BSC (n = 136) or BSC alone (n = 66). In both arms, the median age was 68.0 yrs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 mos; median follow-up time for survival was 24.2 mos. PFS from randomization was not significantly different between nab-P + BSC and BSC alone (median, 3.1 vs 2.6 mos; P = 0.357); median OS was 17.6 and 12.2 mos, respectively. Additional efficacy outcomes are reported in the table. The most frequent grade 3/4 TEAEs over the entire study were neutropenia (53.1% vs 50.0%) and anemia (33.1% vs 32.3%).

Conclusions

Conclusions: Induction nab-P/C followed by maintenance nab-P is feasible for pts with advanced squamous NSCLC. PFS from randomization with nab-P + BSC was not significantly longer vs BSC alone; however, OS was encouraging. No new safety concerns were identified during nab-P maintenance.

Table. Efficacy outcomes

Outcome

nab-P + BSC

BSC alone

PFS (ITT population)

n

136

66

Median, months

3.1

2.6

HR (95% CI)

0.85 (0.61 - 1.19)

P value

0.357

1-year PFS rate, %

16

14

OS (ITT population)

n

136

66

Median, months

17.6

12.2

HR

0.72 (0.49 - 1.04)

P value

0.076

1-year OS rate, %

66

50

OS (ITT population, patients with subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors)

n

81

41

Median, months

18.8

15.5

HR (95% CI)

0.62 (0.39 - 0.99)

P value

0.044

OS (ITT population, patients without subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors)

n

55

25

Median, months

12.9

7.6

HR (95% CI)

0.84 (0.46 - 1.54)

P value

0.575

Response rate (ITT population)

n

136

66

ORR over entire study, %

69.1

57.6

RRR (95% CI)

1.20 (0.95 - 1.52)

P value

0.087

RRR, relative risk ratio.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02027428

Editorial Acknowledgement

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.