Abstract 2936
Background
Demonstrated benefit with maintenance therapy in patients (pts) with squamous NSCLC remains an unmet need. In a subset of pts with advanced squamous NSCLC from a large phase 3 trial, nab-P/C demonstrated a significantly higher improvement in the primary endpoint, overall response rate (ORR; 41% vs 24%; P < 0.001), vs P/C. The ABOUND.sqm study investigated induction nab-P/C followed by nab-P maintenance for these pts.
Methods
Pts with treatment-naive, advanced squamous NSCLC received 4 cycles of induction nab-P 100 mg/m2 on d 1, 8, and 15 + C AUC 6 on d 1 (21-d cycles). Pts not progressing after 4 cycles were randomized 2:1 to maintenance nab-P 100 mg/m2 on d 1 and 8 of each 21-d cycle + best supportive care (BSC) or BSC alone until disease progression (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) from randomization into the maintenance part of the study was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints included safety, overall survival (OS), and ORR.
Results
Of the 420 pts treated in the induction phase, 202 were randomized to maintenance nab-P + BSC (n = 136) or BSC alone (n = 66). In both arms, the median age was 68.0 yrs. All patients were followed for a minimum of 12 mos; median follow-up time for survival was 24.2 mos. PFS from randomization was not significantly different between nab-P + BSC and BSC alone (median, 3.1 vs 2.6 mos; P = 0.357); median OS was 17.6 and 12.2 mos, respectively. Additional efficacy outcomes are reported in the table. The most frequent grade 3/4 TEAEs over the entire study were neutropenia (53.1% vs 50.0%) and anemia (33.1% vs 32.3%).
Conclusions
Conclusions: Induction nab-P/C followed by maintenance nab-P is feasible for pts with advanced squamous NSCLC. PFS from randomization with nab-P + BSC was not significantly longer vs BSC alone; however, OS was encouraging. No new safety concerns were identified during nab-P maintenance.
Table. Efficacy outcomes
Outcome | nab-P + BSC | BSC alone |
---|---|---|
PFS (ITT population) | ||
n | 136 | 66 |
Median, months | 3.1 | 2.6 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.85 (0.61 - 1.19) | |
P value | 0.357 | |
1-year PFS rate, % | 16 | 14 |
OS (ITT population) | ||
n | 136 | 66 |
Median, months | 17.6 | 12.2 |
HR | 0.72 (0.49 - 1.04) | |
P value | 0.076 | |
1-year OS rate, % | 66 | 50 |
OS (ITT population, patients with subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors) | ||
n | 81 | 41 |
Median, months | 18.8 | 15.5 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.62 (0.39 - 0.99) | |
P value | 0.044 | |
OS (ITT population, patients without subsequent immune checkpoint inhibitors) | ||
n | 55 | 25 |
Median, months | 12.9 | 7.6 |
HR (95% CI) | 0.84 (0.46 - 1.54) | |
P value | 0.575 | |
Response rate (ITT population) | ||
n | 136 | 66 |
ORR over entire study, % | 69.1 | 57.6 |
RRR (95% CI) | 1.20 (0.95 - 1.52) | |
P value | 0.087 | |
RRR, relative risk ratio. |
Clinical trial identification
NCT02027428
Editorial Acknowledgement
Resources from the same session
2886 - Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for pembrolizumab or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC: data from KEYNOTE-407
Presenter: Julien Mazieres
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
4406 - Long-term survival in patients (pts) with advanced NSCLC in the KEYNOTE-010 study overall and in pts who completed 2 years of pembrolizumab (pembro)
Presenter: Roy S. Herbst
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
4342 - Pembrolizumab in performance status 2 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of the PePS2 trial
Presenter: Gary Middleton
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
1767 - A randomised phase III trial evaluating the addition of denosumab to standard first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC – the ETOP and EORTC SPLENDOUR trial.
Presenter: Solange Peters
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
4580 - IMpower131: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis of a randomised Phase III study of atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel vs carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel in 1L advanced squamous NSCLC
Presenter: Mark Socinski
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
2984 - IMpower150: clinical safety, tolerability and immune-related adverse events in a Phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + chemotherapy (chemo) _ bevacizumab (bev) vs chemo + bev in 1L nonsquamous NSCLC
Presenter: Martin Reck
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2 - Invited Discussant LBA62, LBA63 and 1384PD
Presenter: Simon Ekman
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2 - Invited Discussant 1385PD, LBA64, LBA65 and 1386PD
Presenter: Sanjay Popat
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Slides
Webcast