Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

2834 - Multimodal detection of homologous recombination repair gene mutations (HRRm) in a Phase II trial of olaparib plus abiraterone in metastatic castrate resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Topics

Cytotoxic Therapy;  Translational Research

Tumour Site

Prostate Cancer

Presenters

Thomas Carr

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii14-viii57. 10.1093/annonc/mdy269

Authors

T.H. Carr1, C. Adelman2, A. Barnicle2, I. Kozarewa2, S. Luke2, Z. Lai3, S. Menon2, S. Hollis4, B. Dougherty3, E.A. Harrington2, J.C. Barrett3, C. Goessl3, F. Saad5, N. Sala6, N.W. Clarke7, D. Hodgson2

Author affiliations

  • 1 ,, AstraZeneca, SG86HB - Cambridge/GB
  • 2 ,, AstraZeneca, Cambridge/GB
  • 3 ,, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg/US
  • 4 ,, Phastar, London/GB
  • 5 ,, University of Montreal Hospital Research Centre, Montreal/CA
  • 6 ,, Catalan Institute of Oncology, Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona/ES
  • 7 ,, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester/GB

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2834

Background

Study 8 [NCT01972217] was a randomized Phase II trial that tested the hypothesis that the combination of PARP inhibition plus abiraterone benefits unselected patients (pts) with mCRPC. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. A key secondary objective was to understand the relationship between HRRm status and outcome, which was challenged by low-tissue acquisition and high-test failure. The primary biomarker analysis focused on testing plasma when tumour data were not available and germline mutations were not evident. Here we describe additional analyses of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) to further characterize HRRm status and evaluate concordance between different testing modalities.

Methods

Tumour specimens were sequenced via Foundation Medicine. Germline analysis was performed via Color Genomics. An inhouse (RUO) sequencing assay was used for baseline ctDNA analysis. A subset of plasma samples was analyzed via GuardantOMNI™ and a custom assay (Resolution Bioscience). CtDNA libraries were also subjected to shallow whole genome sequencing (∼4–5x). From 142 enrolled pts, we obtained HRRm data for 136 (from any source).

Results

Previous tumour/germline analyses identified 8 HRRm pts: 1 somatic, 7 germline (tumour success rate 38/68 [56%]; germline success rate 102/102). CtDNA analyses yielded a success rate of 93% (127/136 pts with plasma analyzed), with tumour variants detectable with high confidence in 79% (100/127). Plasma sequencing identified additional HRRm pts, including homozygous deletions, approximately tripling the number known to have a HRRm. Plasma testing in pts with tumour data revealed high concordance between tumour and ctDNA.

Conclusions

Comprehensive, sensitive sequencing of ctDNA for HRRm is feasible in mCRPC pts with a high success rate. Both targeted and whole genome approaches add value. There was good concordance across testing modalities where gene coverage overlapped, highlighting the considerable value of ctDNA testing in mCRPC where access to tissue of sufficient quality for molecular analysis is challenging, and somatic alterations are common. The first two authors contributed equally.

Clinical trial identification

NCT01972217.

Legal entity responsible for the study

AstraZeneca.

Funding

AstraZeneca.

Editorial Acknowledgement

n/a

Disclosure

T.H. Carr, C. Adelman, A. Barnicle, I. Kozarewa, S. Luke, Z. Lai, S. Menon, B. Dougherty, E.A. Harrington, J.C. Barrett, C. Goessl, D. Hodgson: Employee and stockholder: AstraZeneca. S. Hollis: Contracted: AstraZeneca and own stock. F. Saad: Grants and personal fees: AstraZeneca, Janssen, Astellas, Sanofi, Bayer. N. Sala: Personal fees: Astellas, Janssen, Bristol-Myers Squibb. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.