Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Basic science, Endocrine tumours, Gastrointestinal tumours - colorectal & non-colorectal, Head and neck cancer (excluding thyroid), Melanoma and other skin tumours, Neuroendocrine tumours, Thyroid cancer, Tumour biology & pathology

2957 - Multicenter Phase II Trial of nab-paclitaxel and Cisplatin (AP) followed by Chemoradiation Therapy (CRT) for Locally Advanced Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC)

Date

21 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Basic science, Endocrine tumours, Gastrointestinal tumours - colorectal & non-colorectal, Head and neck cancer (excluding thyroid), Melanoma and other skin tumours, Neuroendocrine tumours, Thyroid cancer, Tumour biology & pathology

Topics

Tumour Site

Head and Neck Cancers

Presenters

Douglas Adkins

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii372-viii399. 10.1093/annonc/mdy287

Authors

D. Adkins1, J. Ley1, H.A. Gay2, M. Daly2, R. Jackson3, J. Rich3, P. Pipkorn3, R.C. Paniello3, K. Trinkaus4, P. Neupane5, J. Zevallos3, W. Thorstad2, P. Oppelt1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Internal Medicine/medical Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, 63110 - St. Louis/US
  • 2 Radiation oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis/US
  • 3 Otolaryngology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis/US
  • 4 Biostatistics, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis/US
  • 5 Medical Oncology, University of Kansas Cancer Center, Fairway/US
More

Abstract 2957

Background

The results of two consecutive phase II trials of patients with locally advanced HNSCC showed relapse rates of 13% after nab-paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-FU and cetuximab (APFC) followed by CRT (Cancer 2013) and 3% after APF (no cetuximab) and CRT (Oral Oncology 2016). The complete response (CR) rates at the primary tumor site after 2 cycles of APFC was 53% and APF 77%. A comparison of APFC and CRT to APF and CRT showed no benefit of cetuximab (Oral Oncology 2017). In this phase II trial, we hypothesized similar efficacy with AP (no 5-FU) and CRT.

Methods

Eligibility criteria were similar to prior trials: stage III-IV oropharynx (OP), larynx, or hypopharynx SCC and adequate organ function and performance status (ECOG 0-1). T1 tumors were excluded. Treatment: 3 cycles of AP followed by CRT. AP: nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1,8 and 15 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1 in 3 week/cycles. CRT: Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 days 1, 22 and 43 or cetuximab weekly (if cisplatin-ineligible) and intensity modulated RT 70 Gy (200 cGy/day). The primary endpoint was clinical CR rate at the primary tumor site after 2 cycles of AP, determined by visual exam. With a non-inferiority margin of 19% (lower boundary: 58%), a 40 patient sample provided power = 0.80 at p = 0.05 to conclude the CR rate at the primary tumor site with AP was non-inferior to APF (77%).

Results

Characteristics of the 40 enrolled patients: mean age 57 years (range 42-77), smoker 68%, male 90%, and ECOG 0 (78%). Tumor characteristics: T3-4 (68%), > N2c (58%), and human papillomavirus (HPV)-related OPSCC (73%) or HPV-unrelated HNSCC (28%). CRT included cisplatin (36) or cetuximab (4). Clinical CR rate at the primary tumor site after 2 cycles AP was 70% (28 patients). Primary tumor site biopsies obtained following 2 cycles AP in 29 patients showed no cancer in 24 (83%). Post-cycle 2 biopsies showed no cancer in 19 of 20 evaluable patients with clinical CR. Median follow-up was 12.0 months (range: 0.1-19.6). Relapse rate was 8% (3 patients).

Conclusions

The CR rate at the primary tumor site after 2 cycles of AP was not inferior to that with APF. Deletion of 5-FU from APF did not reduce tumor response.

Clinical trial identification

NCT02573493.

Legal entity responsible for the study

Washington University School of Medicine.

Funding

Celgene.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Not Applicable.

Disclosure

D. Adkins: Advisory board: Pfizer, Merck; Research funding: Celgene, Pfizer, Merck, Novartis, Lilly, Gliknik, Astra Zeneca, MedImmune, Celldex, Chiltern, Blueprint Medicine. W. Thorstad: Spouse works for Elekta, Inc. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.