Abstract 1147
Background
According to data from the recent studies in Europe and worldwide, a large percentage of patients have restricted access to innovative medicines for metastatic melanoma. In the current study, major determinants of restricted and delayed access to the first-line recommended treatments were analyzed.
Methods
Web-based survey was conducted among melanoma experts from 27 European countries, USA, China, Australia, Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico from September 1st to January 1st, 2018. Data on reimbursement of medicines for metastatic melanoma were correlated with: data on health expenditure per capita (HEPC), Mackenbach score of health policy performance, health technology assessment (HTA), ASCO and ESMO scores of clinical benefit market price of medicines and type of reimbursement. Regression analysis was done using SPSS software (significant correlation if p < 0.05).
Results
The recommended BRAFi+MEKi combination and anti-PD1 immunotherapy were registered and fully reimbursed in 17/34 (50%) countries, and combination anti-CTLA4+anti-PD1 in 9/34 (26.4%) countries. In only 14/34 (41.1%) countries majority of patients (>90%) were treated according to the recommended guidelines, and estimated number of patients without access in surveyed countries was 10131 patients. Median delay in reimbursement was 871 days (0-1274 days). It was in correlation with ASCO (rho=0.819, p = 0.004), ESMO scores of clinical benefit (rho=0.933, p < 0.01), median market price (rho=0.694, p = 0.026), as well as with HEPC, health policy performance scores and HTA assessment implementation (p < 0.05). In majority of countries (64.2%) price negotiations or managed entry agreements (MEA) with national authorities were necessary for reimbursement.
Conclusions
HTA implementation, price negotiations and MEAs were associated with more timely reimbursement. Adding ASCO and ESMO scales of clinical benefit to HTA could better prioritize medicines for reimbursement at international level. Development of patient-oriented research, development, market access and reimbursement mechanisms would be necessary in the future.
Clinical trial identification
Legal entity responsible for the study
Melanoma World Society and European Association of Dermato-Oncology.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Editorial Acknowledgement
Disclosure
L.O. Kandolf Sekulovic: Speakers’ fee: Roche, Novartis, BMS, MSD outside the submitted work. S.S. Agarwala: Travel, accommodations, expenses: MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb. A. Hauschild: Consulting or advisory role, Travel, accommodations, expenses, Honoraria: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MedImmune, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, OncoSec, Roche, Nektar, Philogen, Provectus, Regeneron; Research Funding: Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eisai, GlaxoSmithKline, Merck Serono, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Roche. J. Guo: Consulting or advisory role, Travel, accommodations, expenses: Roche, MSD, Bayer, Pfizer. G.A. McArthur: Research funding: Celgene, Genentech/Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Amgen, Array BioPharma, Novartis/Pfizer. P. Lorigan: Consulting or advisory role: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Amgen, GlaxoSmithKline, NeraCare GmbH, Pierre Fabre; Speakers’ bureau: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Roche; Travel, accommodations, expenses: Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb. G. Cinat: Consulting or advisory role: MSD, Roche, Novartis, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research funding: Genentech, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, MSD, Bristol-Myers Squibb. C. Caglevich: Consulting or advisory role: MSD, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Speakers’ bureau: MSD, Bayer, Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Travel, accommodations, expenses: Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb; Research funding: MSD, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Medivation, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Astellas Pharma. C. Lebbe: Honoraria, Consulting or advisory role, Speakers’ bureau: Roche, Novartis, MSD, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibbs; Research funding: Roche, Bristol-Myers Squibbs. P.L. Rutkowski: Honoraria: MSD, Novartis, Roche, Pfizer, Bristol-Myers Squibbs; Consulting or advisory role: MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Blueprint Medicines. H. Gogas: Consultant or advisory role: BMS, MSD, Amgen, Novartis, Roche, Pierre Fabre; Honoraria: BMS, MSD, Amgen, Novartis, Roche; Travel expenses: Roche, BMS; Research funding: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis. R. Dummer: Outside the submitted work: Research funding: Novartis, MSD, BMS, Roche, GSK; Consultant or advisory board: Novartis, MSD, BMS, Roche, GSK, Amgen, Takeda, Pierre Fabre. B. Neyns: Outside the submitted work: Consulting or advisory role: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis; Speakers’ fees and advisory board meetings: Novartis; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: BMS, MSD, Roche, Novartis, Amgen; Research funding: Pfizer, Novartis, Merck KGaA; Research funding to the institution: Pfizer, Novartis. L. Bastholt: Advisory boards: Roche, BMS, Merck MSD, Novartis, Eisai; Travel, accommodations, expenses: BMS, Merck MSD, Novartis. A. Wainstein: Travel, accomodation: MSD, BMS, Roche. D. Herceg: Speakers’ fees: MSD, Novartis; Consulting or advisory role: BMS; Travel, accommodations, expenses: Roche. C. Garbe: Outside the submitted work: Speakers’ fees: Amgen, BMS, MSD, LEO, Roche, Philogen; Research funding: BMS, Novartis, Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4876 - Variation in Oncology Drug Approvals in Canada, the United States and Europe
Presenter: Omar Khan
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion session - Public health policy - Invited Discussant 1560PD and 1561PD
Presenter: Carin Uyl-de Groot
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
2915 - Magnitude of Clinical Benefit of Cancer Drugs Approved Based on Single-Arm Trials (SAT) by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
Presenter: Consolacion Molto Valiente
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
4334 - Magnitude of Clinical Benefit in Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Accelerated Approval (AA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) Conditional Marketing Authorisation (CMA) and Subsequent Trials Supporting Conversion to Full Approval
Presenter: Maria Borrell Puy
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
4001 - Magnitude of Clinical Benefit of Trials Supporting US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Approval of Breakthrough and Non-breakthrough Drugs
Presenter: Consolacion Molto Valiente
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
4365 - Time to access to novel anticancer therapies in Slovenia in view of the ESMO-MCBS scores
Presenter: Urska Janzic
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion session - Public health policy - Invited Discussant 1563PD, 1564PD and 1565PD
Presenter: Fredericus Eskens
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
4536 - Cascade BRCA Germline Mutation (BGM) Testing of women with Breast (BC) or Epithelial Ovarian Cancer( EOC) and their families with subsequent Risk Reducing Surgery(RRS): A Canadian Economics Model
Presenter: paul Hoskins
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
1746 - Genetic testing of BRCA mutations in breast cancer in six European countries: Barriers and opportunities
Presenter: Maia Thrift-Perry
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract
504 - Public awareness of cancer in the Gaza-Strip: a cross-sectional study
Presenter: MohamedRaed Elshami
Session: Poster Discussion session - Public health policy
Resources:
Abstract