Abstract 4406
Background
KEYNOTE-010 (NCT01905657) is a global, open-label, phase 2/3 study of pembro 10 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg Q3W vs docetaxel in pts with previously treated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥1%. Pembro improved OS vs docetaxel in the PD-L1 TPS ≥1% and ≥50% co-primary analyses (median follow-up, 13.1 mo), with no difference between pembro doses. We present updated OS for the study overall and results for pts who completed 35 cycles (~2 y) of pembro.
Methods
Pts >18 years with previously treated advanced NSCLC with PD-L1 TPS ≥1% were randomized (1:1:1) to pembro 10 mg/kg or 2 mg/kg Q3W, or docetaxel 75 mg/m2 Q3W. Pts received pembro for 35 cycles or until disease progression/intolerable toxicity. After the primary analysis, crossover from docetaxel to pembro was allowed. Response was assessed every 9 wk (RECIST 1.1 by independent central review), and survival every 2 mo after treatment ended. OS was a primary endpoint. Pembro doses were pooled.
Results
As of March 16, 2018, median (range) follow-up was 42.5 (35.2–53.2) mo. Among all pts (N=1033), pembro improved OS vs docetaxel (HR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.60–0.80; P<0.00001), with median (95% CI) OS of 11.8 (10.4–13.1) mo vs 8.4 (7.6–9.5) mo, and 36-mo OS rate of 23% vs 11%, respectively. Incidence of grade 3–5 treatment-related AEs was similar to the primary analysis: 16% of pts in the pembro group and 36% in the docetaxel group had grade 3–5 treatment-related AEs (0.7% and 1.6%, respectively, had grade 5 AEs). 22% and 9% of pts, respectively, had immune-mediated AEs and infusion reactions. Among 79 pts who completed 35 pembro cycles, the 36-mo OS rate was 99% and 95% had PR/CR as best response. Response was ongoing in 44 pts (59%); median duration of response was not reached (range, 1+ to 46+ mo). 25 of 79 pts (32%) had PD (investigator review) after stopping 35 cycles of treatment, 13 of whom started second course pembro.
Conclusions
With an additional 30-mo follow-up from the primary analyses, pembro continued to prolong OS vs docetaxel in pts with previously treated, PD-L1–expressing advanced NSCLC, with manageable long-term safety. Most pts who completed 2 y of pembro had durable response, and the majority of pts who had PD after stopping 35 cycles of pembro were able to receive a second course of pembro.
Clinical trial identification
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01905657
Editorial Acknowledgement
Medical writing and editorial assistance was provided by C4 MedSolutions, LLC (Yardley, PA), a CHC Group company. This assistance was funded by Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, USA.
Resources from the same session
2886 - Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for pembrolizumab or placebo plus carboplatin and paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel in patients with metastatic squamous NSCLC: data from KEYNOTE-407
Presenter: Julien Mazieres
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
4342 - Pembrolizumab in performance status 2 patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results of the PePS2 trial
Presenter: Gary Middleton
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
1767 - A randomised phase III trial evaluating the addition of denosumab to standard first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC – the ETOP and EORTC SPLENDOUR trial.
Presenter: Solange Peters
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
2936 - nab-Paclitaxel + Carboplatin Induction Followed by nab-Paclitaxel Maintenance in Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC): Results From the ABOUND.sqm Study
Presenter: David Spigel
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
4580 - IMpower131: Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) analysis of a randomised Phase III study of atezolizumab + carboplatin + paclitaxel or nab-paclitaxel vs carboplatin + nab-paclitaxel in 1L advanced squamous NSCLC
Presenter: Mark Socinski
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
2984 - IMpower150: clinical safety, tolerability and immune-related adverse events in a Phase III study of atezolizumab (atezo) + chemotherapy (chemo) _ bevacizumab (bev) vs chemo + bev in 1L nonsquamous NSCLC
Presenter: Martin Reck
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Abstract
Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2 - Invited Discussant LBA62, LBA63 and 1384PD
Presenter: Simon Ekman
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2 - Invited Discussant 1385PD, LBA64, LBA65 and 1386PD
Presenter: Sanjay Popat
Session: Poster Discussion session - NSCLC, metastatic 2
Resources:
Slides
Webcast