Abstract 3898
Background
Integration of oncology and palliative care (PC) combines two paradigms: the tumour-directed approach, which is the main focus of oncology, and the host-directed approach, which is the focus of PC. Contemporary PC aims to prevent, treat and reduce symptoms and suffering and to preserve and improve quality of life. A Lancet Oncology Commission was written on how PC and oncology can be integrated by combining these two approaches focusing content, models, organization of cancer care, public health, politics, education and research.
Methods
An international panel was established, consisting of experts in oncology, PC, public health and psycho-oncology. Literature searches were conducted, author meetings were held, and an interactive writing process was conducted.
Results
Integration is a complex process that involves various components of the health care system. The published RCTs on integration demonstrate health gains, but how and when to integrate is uncertain. Still, early delivery of specialist palliative care promotes patient-centeredness including shared-decision making, family involvement and regular use of patient-reported outcome measures. Barriers to integration include the perception of PC as end-of-life care, deficient planning at local, national and international levels, and insufficient infrastructure and funding. Furthermore, death and dying are stigmatized. The present competence in combined oncology and PC varies substantially and must be defined at all levels. The commission proposes to use standardized care pathways (SCPs) and multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) to promote integration. Integration raises new research questions: how much, when and how should PC be delivered and what is the minimum model for good care?
Conclusions
Integration involves the transition from a dualistic perspective - the tumor and the host- to a combined perspective. Integration must be recommended by health care authorities and decision-takers, followed by resource allocation and priority-setting. In all areas, the present volume of PC is too small to support integration on a broad scale. Implementation of integrated models is best secured by MDTs and SCPs. The combined perspective must be reflected in care models, education and research funding.
Clinical trial identification
Legal entity responsible for the study
Oslo University Hospital.
Funding
Has not received any funding.
Editorial Acknowledgement
Disclosure
S. Kaasa, J.H. Loge: Stockholder: Eir-solution. T. Albreht: Grants: European Commission and Ministry of Health of Slovenia, during the conduct of the study; Grants and personal fees: Pfizer Oncology, outside the submitted work. A.T. Caraceni: Grants: Molteni; Grants and personal fees: Italfarmaco; Personal fees: Sandoz, Pierre Fabre Institute; Gants: Gruenenthal, Ipsen, outside the submitted work. K. Jordan: Personal fees: MSD, Helsinn, Tesaro, Amgen, Pfizer, Merck, Hexal, outside the submitted work. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
4596 - Neoadjuvant Trial of nab-paclitaxel and Atezolizumab (Atezo), a PD-L1 inhibitor, in patients (pts) with chemo-insensitive Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC)
Presenter: Jennifer Litton
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
5349 - Prognostic implications of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC)
Presenter: Carolyn Hall
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
2568 - A prediction model for pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy of HER2-negative breast cancer patients
Presenter: Lothar Häberle
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
5413 - Evaluation of the MammaTyper® as a molecular predictor for pathological complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) and outcome in patients with different breast cancer (BC) subtypes
Presenter: Peter A. Fasching
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
2260 - Impact of clinical, morphologic and molecular characteristics on response to neoadjuvant systemic therapy (NAST) in metaplastic breast cancer (MpBC)
Presenter: Clinton Yam
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
4722 - Evaluation of Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 overexpression (HER2+) after administration of neoadjuvant treatment (NAT) and prognostic impact in breast cancer (BC)
Presenter: Duarte Machado
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
4307 - Complete response (CR) to anthracycline-based chemotherapy using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) predicts high rates of pathologic complete response (pCR) for triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) patients treated preoperatively with anthracycline and taxane-based regimens
Presenter: Maria Marin Alcala
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
5018 - Immunomonitoring of triple negative breast cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant therapy (GBG89, Geparnuevo trial)
Presenter: Barbara Seliger
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
3203 - Impact of breast cancer subtype on survival after lumpectomy versus mastectomy for early stage invasive breast cancer
Presenter: YU-CHEN Tsai
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract
4887 - Survival Outcomes of Dose Dense Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Patients – Indian Scenario
Presenter: TANVI Sood
Session: Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care
Resources:
Abstract