Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

4494 - Individual and Familial Phenotype in Hereditary Ovarian Cancer

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Topics

Genetic and Genomic Testing, Counseling

Tumour Site

Ovarian Cancer

Presenters

Maria Beatriz Mira

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii332-viii358. 10.1093/annonc/mdy285

Authors

M.B.D.O. Mira1, I. Miguel2, S. Fragoso3, A. Opinião2, A.C. Luís2, A. Clara2, S. Bento2, P. Machado3, S. Santos3, P. Rodrigues2, J. Parreira2, F. Vaz2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Instituto Portuguès de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG EPE), 1099-023 - Lisbon/PT
  • 2 Family Risk Clinic, Instituto Portuguès de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG EPE), 1099-023 - Lisbon/PT
  • 3 Molecular Pathology Investigational Center, Instituto Portuguès de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, E.P.E. (IPOLFG EPE), 1099-023 - Lisbon/PT
More

Resources

Abstract 4494

Background

Germline mutations impacting homologous recombination repair (HCR) have been associated with predisposition to breast (BC) and ovarian cancer (OC), and more than 1/5 of OC have hereditary susceptibility (HOC). Other genes than BRCA have been associated with HOC.

Methods

All index, consecutive, non-mucinous OC patients (pts) counselled between September 2016-December 2017 were tested upfront for a panel testing (PT) including BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD50, RAD51C, RAD51D and BRIP1 (BRCA Hereditary Cancer MASTER Plus methodology). We analyze the molecular results, their clinical characteristics and family history (FH).

Results

One hundred and one female pts with OC diagnosis consented to PT. Pathogenic variants (PV) were found in 19 pts (18.8%): BRCA2 – 8 (42%), BRCA1 – 5 (26%), RAD51C – 3 (16%), RAD51D – 2 (11%), RAD50 – 1 (5%). The majority of these OC had been previously classified as high-grade serous (HGS) (n = 13 - 68%).We identified 2 pts with low-grade serous carcinoma (LGSC) with pathogenic variants (1 BRCA2; 1 RAD51C). Although median age of diagnosis (MAD) was lower for BRCA2 (55 years) and BRCA1 (58 years) than “non-hereditary” and RAD50/RAD51C/RAD51D pts (both groups with MAD of 63 years), difference was non significant (p = 0.21). As for FH (defined as: other OC and/or BC < 50 years and/or male BC), only 54% of BRCA1/2 pts and none of RAD50/RAD51C/RAD51D had a positive FH. Eighteen percent of “non-hereditary” OC pts had positive FH. With a median follow up of 5 yrs, 63% of pts harboring PV and 50% of those with no PV relapsed, with 2 pts having central nervous system relapses (1 - RAD51D and 1 - RAD50). All but 7 pts were alive at analysis time, only one with a germline mutation impacting HCR (RAD50 mutation).

Conclusions

Family history was not associated with the detection of germline pathogenic variants and should not be a criteria for selection of OC for genetic testing. While the inclusion of other genes in our panel may increase our detection rate, excluding LGSC (not included in some guidelines as candidates for testing) would not detect an undetermined number of pts, since the association between LGSC and HOC is not clarified. Longer follow up may help clarify if there is a genotype/phenotype correlation regarding patterns of relapse in hereditary ovarian cancer.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Family Risk Clinic - Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil EPE.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.