Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Basic science, Endocrine tumours, Gastrointestinal tumours - colorectal & non-colorectal, Head and neck cancer (excluding thyroid), Melanoma and other skin tumours, Neuroendocrine tumours, Thyroid cancer, Tumour biology & pathology

2975 - Immune gene expression profiling (GEP) of resected gastric adenocarcinomas (GAs) to identify biomarkers associated with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICPI) response in early stage disease

Date

21 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Basic science, Endocrine tumours, Gastrointestinal tumours - colorectal & non-colorectal, Head and neck cancer (excluding thyroid), Melanoma and other skin tumours, Neuroendocrine tumours, Thyroid cancer, Tumour biology & pathology

Topics

Translational Research

Tumour Site

Gastric Cancer

Presenters

Joseph Chao

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii205-viii270. 10.1093/annonc/mdy282

Authors

J. Chao1, H. Yin2, J. Lee3, S.J. Klempner4, R. Pillai2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology And Therapeutics, City of Hope, 91010 - Duarte/US
  • 2 Department Of Pathology, City of Hope, 91010 - Duarte/US
  • 3 Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul/KR
  • 4 Medical Oncology, The Angeles Clinic and Research Institute, 90025 - Los Angeles/US

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 2975

Background

Clinical trials of ICPIs in early stage GA are ongoing. Nanostring (NS) GEP allows for simultaneous interrogation of a wide range of genes involved in immune signaling. We conducted a retrospective analysis of resected GAs to gain insight on the immune landscape in this setting.

Methods

We profiled 45 archival GAs treated with upfront surgery (pT2N0 to pT4N3 AJCC7) using a 770-gene immune profiling panel on the NS platform. Clinicopathologic data were abstracted and overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

Results

The majority of patients (44/45) had ≥ stage II disease. NS GEP demonstrated 4 distinct molecular signatures, A-D. Group D exhibited the greatest downregulation of pro-inflammatory genes relative to the other 3. Grouping was not correlated to tumor location, Lauren histology, or stage. When applying an analogous 18 gene T-cell inflamed signature from the KEYNOTE-059 trial, 10/45 GAs matched this signature, indicative of higher likelihood of response to single agent ICPI. OS did not differ between T-cell inflamed vs. non-T-cell inflamed (Table). Comparing signatures associated with greatest (B+C) vs. least (A+D) CD8+ T-cell gene expression as a surrogate for T-cell infiltration, OS favored groups B+C. We also observed a 4 gene (MS4A1, CD19, BLK, TNFRSF17) B-cell signature significantly favored high vs. low expressors for OS.Table: 686P

NS GEP (n)Median OS (mo)Log-rank Test
T-cell inflammed (10)Not reached (NR)p = .52
Non-T-cell inflamed (35)59.9
Group B+C (24)NRp = .07
Group A+D (21)33.0
High B score (23)NRp = .02
Low B score (22)33.0

Conclusions

This data supports ongoing trials of ICPIs in early stage GA. ICPIs alone are unlikely to be sufficient for the majority of patients, necessitating biomarkers to guide addition of ICPIs to current multimodality approaches. Subsets of GAs were quantifiable by NS GEP to exhibit pre-existing CD8+ T-cell infiltration or B-cell signaling and more favorable prognosis. This suggests ICPIs alone or chemotherapy de-escalation strategies should be explored. Tumor-immune cell immunohistochemistry and MSI data will be presented.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

City of Hope.

Funding

NIH.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

J. Chao: Research funding: Merck, Novonco Therapeutics; Consulting, Advisory roles: Lilly, Five Prime Therapeutics, Boston Biomedical, Merck; Speakers\' bureau: Merck. S.J. Klempner: Research funding: Leap Therapeutics; Consulting, Advisory roles: Lilly, Boston Biomedical, Astellas Pharma; Speakers\' bureau: Foundation Medicine. R. Pillai: Consulting, Advisory roles: Qiagen. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.