Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

1933 - Immune-checkpoint inhibitors in previously treated patients with urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Tumour Site

Urothelial Cancer

Presenters

Emmanuele De Luca

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii303-viii331. 10.1093/annonc/mdy283

Authors

E. De Luca1, V. Di Nunno2, C. Buttigliero3, M. Tucci3, F. Vignani4, C. Zichi4, A. Ardizzoni2, F. Massari2, M. Di Maio4

Author affiliations

  • 1 Division Of Medical Oncology, "Ordine Mauriziano" Hospital, 10128 - Torino/IT
  • 2 Division Of Oncology, S.Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, 40138 - Bologna/IT
  • 3 Division Of Medical Oncology, “San Luigi Gonzaga" Hospital, Orbassano, Torino/IT
  • 4 Division Of Medical Oncology, "Ordine Mauriziano" Hospital, Torino/IT

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 1933

Background

Very few therapeutic options are available in patients with advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma progressed or unfit to platinum based therapy. After decades of failures, a new classes of agents: the immune-checkpoint inhibitors seem to be a new promising hope for these patients. However, to date of the two randomized studies comparing these compounds to standard chemotherapy only one trial showed a clear survival advantage in this setting.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy, in terms of overall survival, of single agent immune-checkpoint inhibitors vs. single agent chemotherapy as second-line treatment. Moreover, we evaluated the assessed ORR of single-agent immune-checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced urothelial cancer exploring the predictive value of patients’ selection according to PD-L1 expression. To do this, we reviewed clinical trials published on Pubmed/Medline, Cochrane library and clinical abstracts presented on main International meeting between 2014 and 2018.

Results

Systematic review included randomized (n = 2) and non-randomized (n = 9) clinical trials. We restricted meta-analysis to trials exploring immune-checkpoint inhibitors in previously platinum treated patients.In randomized trials, immune checkpoint inhibitors were associated with a significant improvement of overall survival compared to chemotherapy in unselected patients, with pooled Hazard Ratio 0.80 (95% confidence interval 0.69 – 0.93, p = 0.003), while the difference was not statistically significant in the subgroup of patients selected for the highest PD-L1 expression (Hazard Ratio 0.72, 95% confidence interval 0.48 – 1.09, p = 0.12). Polled probability of objective response was 0.18 (95% confidence interval 0.16 – 0.20) in unselected patients and 0.27% (95% confidence interval 0.25 – 0.32) in patients selected for the highest expression of PD-L1.

Conclusions

Immunotherapy showed a significant survival advantage in patients not selected for PD-L1 expression while both OS and ORR analysis suggested that the predictive value of PD-L1 expression is far from being optimal.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Francesco Massari.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.