Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EONS Poster diplay

3414 - EONS Poster - Patients’ interpretations and experiences of participation in cancer care

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

EONS Poster diplay

Topics

Patient Education and Advocacy

Tumour Site

Presenters

Jennie Jackson

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii695-viii697. 10.1093/annonc/mdy277

Authors

J. Jackson, J. Rundgren

Author affiliations

  • Project: Coordinating Contact Nurse, Regional Cancer Center Stockholm Gotland, 102 39 - Stockholm/SE
More

Abstract 3414

Background

The definition of patient participation is multifaceted but often reduced to solely implicate the involvement in treatment decisions. In many countries, including Sweden, there is a current shift from patient-centered care to person-centered care. This emphasizes the importance to view the patient as an equal partner and always include his or her description of their unique situation. To facilitate the participation of patients and to put their needs first, we need a wider understanding of how participation is interpreted and experienced by the patients themselves. Hence our aim was to examine this among patients with gynecological, hematological, head-neck or upper gastrointestinal cancer.

Methods

A qualitative cross-sectional study was carried out. This included all patients in the Stockholm-Gotland region, diagnosed in 2016 with one of the above-mentioned cancer types. A free-text question was formulated which asked the participants to describe their experiences of participation. The question was included in a larger questionnaire study from the Regional Cancer Center and sent out to 1658 patients. Framework Analysis was used as the method to analyse and interpret the data.

Results

A total of 434 participants chose to answer the study specific free-text question and 222 of those answers were deemed to meet the aim of the study. The analytical process resulted in three themes; communication, staff attitudes and relation. Above all, the participants described how individualized information and a perceptive attitude among staff were key prerequisites for participation. Furthermore, they pointed out that absence of continuity became an obstacle for creating meaningful relations with their care provider and thus hindering their participation.

Conclusions

To meet the current and future demands of individualized cancer care we need to redefine our understanding of patient participation. The emphasis, according to patients, should be on facilitating conditions to aid participation. Our understanding is that these conditions resonate the key aspects of person-centered care. The challenge lies in implementing person-centered care in the whole team and across each patient’s cancer trajectory.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

The Regional Cancer Center Stockholm-Gotland.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.