Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

EONS Poster diplay

2213 - EONS Poster - Comparing nurses’ and patients’ research priorities in cancer care: A mixed methods systematic review


22 Oct 2018


EONS Poster diplay


Patient Education and Advocacy

Tumour Site


Lucia Cadorin


Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii689-viii693. 10.1093/annonc/mdy341


L. Cadorin1, I. Truccolo2, V. Bressan3, N. Suter1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Continuing Education Centre, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, 33081 - Pordenone/IT
  • 2 Scientific And Patient Library, CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute, 33081 - Aviano/IT
  • 3 Ent Department, University of Udine, 33100 - Udine/IT

Abstract 2213


Cancer nurses struggle to meet the challenges in providing quality nursing care in changing environments characterized by advances in drugs and technologies, aging populations, increasing rates of cancer and survival, rising costs, long-term survival patients and increasing economic constraints. Research priorities need to be established within this context because they can encourage the new generation of nurses to respond competently to patients’ advanced care needs.


A systematic review was performed to compare and discuss nurses’ and cancer patients’ main cancer research priorities according to the PRISMA guidelines (PROSPERO registration: CRD42017059721). Studies retrieved were evaluated with a Mixed Methods Appraisal (MMAT). All medical databases were searched from January 2000 to July 2017. Study inclusion, data extraction, and assessment were performed by two researchers independently (inter-rater agreement, kappa =0.70; SE = 0.87; p < 0.01).


Among 16 studies identified, 13 included nurses’ research priorities, 2 patients’, and 1 both. They included descriptive cross-sectional (50%), Delphi (44%), and exploratory qualitative studies (6%). Qualitative studies varied from 75% to 100% of the total MMAT score. Nurses’ priorities were as follows: cancer behavioral psychological/social issues and professional dimensions. Patients’ priorities were patient life dimensions and health promotion. Cancer care dimensions and continuum of care emerged as research priorities of both.


The results underline nurses’ and patients’ research priorities to investigate the patients’ advanced care needs and provide a useful template to guide cancer-nursing research. Identifying priorities helps focus on particular issues rather than promoting isolated and unrelated studies of patients’ needs. Most of the nurses who participated were affiliated with professional associations and do not reflect the entire nursing population. Moreover, very similar survey questionnaires have been used (the items did not cover all areas) with the possible priorities not considered by participants. More studies are needed for the creation of a cancer research priority agenda.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

CRO Aviano National Cancer Institute.


Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement


All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.