Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

4120 - Clinical Features and Prognosis of Eighty-five Patients with Primary Pulmonary Lymphoepithelioma-like Carcinoma

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Presenters

qin yin

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii488-viii492. 10.1093/annonc/mdy291

Authors

Q.Y. yin, G.Y. Gao, C.Z. Zhou, Z. Zhu, Y.Q. Liu, X.H. Xie, X.Q. Lin, Z.H. Xie, J.X. Zhang, O.Y. Ming, S.Y. li, R.C. Chen

Author affiliations

  • State Key Laboratory Of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical research Center Of Respiratory Disease, Guangzhou Institute Of The Respiratory Disease, The 1st Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, 510000 - Guangzhou/CN

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4120

Background

Pulmonary lymphoepithelioma-like carcinoma (PLELC) is a rare subtype of lung cancer that is less reported and not well understood around the world.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of clinical features for 85 patients was conducted to determine the prognostic factors in terms of age, gender, radiographic features, serum tumor markers, TNM stages, pathological features, treatment and prognosis.

Results

PLELC preferentially affects the young (< 60 years old: 71.8%) nonsmokers (72.9%), without significant difference in gender. The median follow-up time was 15 months (1-37 months) for the whole group and most patients were in the early stage with opportunity of operation (50.6%). For the advanced stage group, patients mainly received chemotherapies and radiotherapies, the 0.5-year and 1.5-year PFS rates were 61% and 29%, respectively. The TNM stage (P = 0.014) and performance status (PS) (P = 0.040) were associated with PFS significantly in the univariate analysis, while TNM stage was an independent prognostic factor in multivariate analysis (P = 0.026). In the subtype analysis, patients in the advanced stage receiving Gemcitabine plus platinum (GP group) or Paclitaxel plus platinum (TP group) had better PFS than Pemetrexed plus platinum (PP group) (P = 0.005).

Conclusions

PLELC had a better prognosis compared with other types of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and was sensitive to radiotherapy and chemotherapy. The current results recommended that the GP and TP should be used as first-line treatment of PLELC. The TNM stage and PS were predictive in prognosis of PLELC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Y. Qin.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.