Abstract 2361
Background
In patients with recurrent ovarian cancer (ROC) suitable for platinum-based retreatment (PBT), standard includes CG-BEV and Carboplatin(C)/pegylated-liposomal- Doxorubicin (D). CG-BEV significantly increases progression-free-survival (PFS) over CG alone whilst CD has one of the best therapeutic indices for ROC-PBT. The aim of this trial was to evaluate whether CD is superior to CG when given in combination with BEV with investigator-determined PFS as primary objective (NCT01837251).
Methods
Between 2013/08 and 2015/07 682 pts. with ROC-PBT were randomized to standard CG-BEV (n = 337) or experimental CD-BEV (n = 345). Secondary objectives were overall survival (OS), biological progression-free survival (PFSBIO) by serum CA125, quality of life (QoL) assessed by EORTC-QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OV28, safety and tolerability. The trial was designed to have 80% power (two-sided logrank-test, alpha level 5%) to show a 26.6% change in PFS (Hazard Ratio (HR) 0.79; 564 PFS events).
Results
At data cut-off 571 events occurred. Mean age was 61.1 (SD 10.3) years, 87.4% had serous histology, 83.1% were high grade, 41.5% were pretreated with BEV as part of first-line treatment. CG-BEV was associated with 359 (53,3%) serious adverse events vs. 314 (46,7%) for CD-BEV (p = 0.083). Median PFS in the standard arm CG-BEV was 11.7 months (95% CI 11.1-12.8) vs. 13.3 months (95% CI 11.7-14.3) in the experimental arm CD-BEV (HR 0.80; 95% CI 0.68-0.96, p = 0.0128). In the stratum with previous anti-angiogenic treatment (N = 309) median PFS was 10.1 months (95% CI 8.5-11.2) for CG-BEV vs. 11.3 months (95% CI 10.1-13.8) for CD-BEV (HR 0.73; 95% CI 0.57-0.94, p = 0.0126).
Conclusions
CD-BEV provided a significant PFS improvement compared to CG-BEV in patients with ROC suitable for PBT. A significant PFS improvement was also seen in the subgroup of patients with previous anti-angiogenic treatment. CD-BEV was associated with fewer serious adverse events. Thus CD-BEV might be an important addition to the therapeutic options in these patients.
Clinical trial identification
Legal entity responsible for the study
AGO Research GmbH.
Funding
Hoffmann La Roche.
Editorial Acknowledgement
Disclosure
J. Pfisterer: Consulting or Advisory role: Roche; Research funding: Roche; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche. A.P. Dean: Honoraria: Baxalta, Astra Zeneca; Consulting or Advisory role: Baxalta, specialized Therapeutics; Speakers' bureau: Baxalta; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Amgen. P. Harter: Consulting or Advisory role: AstraZeneca, Roche/Genentech, Tesaro, Clovis, PharmaMar, Lilly, Sotio; Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Medac. F. Joly: Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, Janssen; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche, Janssen. J. Sehouli: Honoraria: Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, PharmaMar; Consulting or Advisory role: Clovis, Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro, Novartis; Research funding: Amgen, Novartis, Lilly, Bayer. U. Canzler: Honoraria: AstraZeneca, Roche Consulting or Advisory role: Roche. B. Schmalfeldt: Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca. C. Shannon: Consulting or Advisory role: AstraZeneca, Roche. D.U. Reimer: Consulting or Advisory role: AstraZeneca, PharmaMar; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Amgen, PharmaMar, Roche Patents, Royalties, other intellectual property: yes. L.C. Hanker: Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, Tesaro; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca. T. Petit: Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, Pfizer; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche, Pierre Fabre. F. Marme´: Honoraria: Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Genomic Health; Consulting or Advisory Role: roche, AstraZeneca, Novartis; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Eisai, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, PharmaMar. A. El-Balat: Honoraria: Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro; Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: PharmaMar, Tesaro, Clovis. R. Glasspool: Consulting or Advisory role: Tesaro, Roche, Clovis Oncology, Clovis; Research Funding: Ignyta, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: AstraZeneca, Roche, Tesaro. N. de Gregorio: Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, AstraZeneca, Tesaro; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Tesaro. S. Mahner: Honoraria: Roche/Genentech, AstraZeneca, PharmaMar, Medac, Jenapharm, Janssen-Cilag, Teva, GlaxoSmithKline; Consulting or Advisory role: Roche, AstraZeneca, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Janssen-Cilag, Tesaro, Medac; Research funding: Roche, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen-Cilag, Medac, PharmaMar, Tesaro, Bayer. J-E. Kurtz: Consulting or Advisory role: Tesaro, AstraZeneca; Travel, Accomodations, Expenses: Roche, PharmaMar. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.
Resources from the same session
2064 - Phase III trial of Lurbinectedin versus PLD or Topotecan in platinum-resistant ovarian cancer patients: Results of CORAIL trial
Presenter: Stephanie Gaillard
Session: Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers - Invited Discussant One LBA TBC and 932O
Presenter: Sandro Pignata
Session: Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
3404 - Alienor/ENGOT-ov7 randomized trial exploring weekly Paclitaxel (wP) + bevacizumab (bev) vs wP alone for patients with ovarian Sex Cord tumors (SCT) in relapse
Presenter: Isabelle Ray-Coquard
Session: Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
1946 - OVPSYCH2: A randomised study of psychological support versus standard of care following chemotherapy for ovarian cancer
Presenter: Sarah Blagden
Session: Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers - Invited Discussant 933O and 934O
Presenter: Susana Banerjee
Session: Proffered paper session - Gynaecological cancers
Resources:
Slides
Webcast