Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

4949 - Cancer patients’ perceptions of palliative care

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

End-of-Life Care

Tumour Site

Presenters

Jaclyn Yoong

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii548-viii556. 10.1093/annonc/mdy295

Authors

J. Yoong1, B. Chosich1, M. Burgess1, A. Earnest2, F. Runacres1, L. William1, M. Franco1, P. Poon1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Supportive And Palliative Care Unit, Monash Health, 3168 - Melbourne/AU
  • 2 Epidemiology And Preventive Medicine, Monash University, 3004 - Melbourne/AU

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4949

Background

Despite clear benefits and increased efforts towards earlier integration of palliative care (PC) with oncology, there are concerns that PC remains stigmatized and predominantly associated with end-of-life care (EOLC). This project aims to explore current perceptions and understanding of PC in cancer patients.

Methods

Prospective survey conducted in the oncology ward of a tertiary academic hospital in Melbourne, Australia. Over a 4-month period a 16-item questionnaire was distributed to all cancer patients upon admission to the ward (N = 103). Chi-Squared test was used to examine for significant factors related to patients’ perceptions of PC.

Results

Ninety-six patients (93%) completed the questionnaire; of which 76% had metastatic cancer. Of the domains explored, salient findings were: 1) Familiarity and experience: 76% had heard of PC; while only 21% had received PC. Self-rating of PC knowledge was varied, and evenly distributed: 31% good/excellent, 36% average and 33% below average/poor. 2) Roles of PC and oncology: 86% believed they could receive concurrent oncology care and 81% believed they could receive anti-cancer treatment whilst receiving PC. Those who had heard of PC were significantly more likely to respond that they could receive concurrent anti-cancer treatment (p = 0.005), as well as those who had better self-rated PC knowledge (p = 0.045). 3) Perceptions: 45% believed PC was only associated with EOLC. Those more likely to disagree with this statement had received PC services (p = 0.039). The majority (77%) felt comforted with PC involvement; this was significantly associated with older age (p = 0.047) and an understanding that oncology (p < 0.005) and anti-cancer treatment (p = 0.013) could continue. However, 40% felt frightened and 29% felt hopeless about a referral to PC. Notably, 50% felt more comfortable with “supportive care” services (versus PC), 25% were neutral and 25% were not.

Conclusions

This survey had an excellent response rate and results were reassuring that, in general, respondents had an accurate understanding of and positive perceptions of PC. Familiarity and comfort with PC were associated with significantly better understanding of PC. This may reflect overall progress in integration of PC and oncology care.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Research Support Services, Monash Health.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.