Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

5414 - Assessment to predict survival and risk of progression in patients with newly multiple myeloma in different age groups.

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Biomarkers, Gynaecological cancers, Haematological malignancies, Immunotherapy of cancer, New diagnostic tools, NSCLC - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, SCLC, Thoracic malignancies, Translational research

Topics

Tumour Site

Multiple Myeloma

Presenters

Iryna Kriachok

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii359-viii371. 10.1093/annonc/mdy286

Authors

I. Kriachok1, O. Novosad1, K. Ulianchenko2, T. Skrypets2, T. Kadnikova2

Author affiliations

  • 1 Oncohematology, National Cancer Institute of the MPH Ukraine, 03022 - Kiev/UA
  • 2 Oncohematology, National Cancer Institute of the MPH Ukraine, Kiev/UA
More

Abstract 5414

Background

Treatment options and outcomes for multiple myeloma (MM) pts were greatly changed over the last 10 years. Treatment according to different age groups requires careful consideration of the balance between maximizing efficacy and acceptable tolerability.

Methods

100 pts (median age: 63, range 34-80; m: 63, f: 37) were registered in NCI from Jan 2006 to Jan 2018. 19% (19/100) of patients received M2, MP, DAV therapy (group1), 46% (46/100) - thalidomide-based (group2) and 35% (35/100) -PI-based regimens (group3). In 28% patients t(4:14), del13, and del17p13] were assessed. The primary endpoint was EFS and OS.

Results

For 100 pts the ORR was 70 %. We recorded 39% relapses in the follow-up after the 1st line therapy (median – 10.9 months; range 2–129). 61.1% vs 47.8% vs 17.1% relapses were diagnosed in group1 vs group2 vs group3, respectively (p < 0.05). 3-year EFS for group1 was 18% vs 30% in group3 and 20% vs 30% for group2 vs group3, respectively (p = 0.002). ROC analysis confirmed bortezomib-based regimens improved EFS in MM patients without age correlation (Se = 81%; Sp = 54%; AUC=0.7, p = 0.0001). EFS was higher in the group 2 pts <65 y.o. vs > 65 y.o (40% vs 18%, p < 0.05). 3-year OS was 65% vs 45% in younger pts vs elderly pts, respectively (p = 0.009). Thrombosis complications in group 2 were compared in pts >65 y.o (20%) vs < 65 y.o (7.7%), (p < 0.05). 3-year EFS and OS were similar in the group 3 (p = 0.4). Also, neurotoxicity was the same in different age groups (58.6% vs 60%). 50% vs 33.8% cases of disease progression had patients who received doublet and triplet regimens, respectively (p < 0.05). ROC analysis confirmed doublet regimen association with lower EFS pts >65 y.o (Se = 50%; Sp = 100%; AUC=0.7, p = 0.04). Median EFS in pts with del17p13 was lower without any correlation with age (10.9 vs 29.7 months). We did not find any significant association between patients with del13 or t(4:14) and clinical outcome of MM.

Conclusions

Bortezomib-based regimens are still in a priority for the 1st-line treatment in different age groups. Thalidomide might be an option for younger pts, because thrombosis events are more frequent in elderly pts. To achieve better response in the 1st-line therapy, it is preferable to use triplet regimens in pts <65 and >65 years old.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Olga Novosad.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.