Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster Discussion session - CNS tumours

4352 - Androgen receptor expression in breast cancer brain metastases

Date

20 Oct 2018

Session

Poster Discussion session - CNS tumours

Topics

Pathology/Molecular Biology

Tumour Site

Breast Cancer

Presenters

Elisabeth Bergen

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii122-viii132. 10.1093/annonc/mdy273

Authors

E.S. Bergen1, A.S. Berghoff2, U. Rajky3, M. Rudas4, Z. Bago-Horvath5, R. Exner6, K. Dieckmann7, G. Widhalm8, M.I. Gnant6, C.C. Zielinski9, G.G. Steger1, M. Preusser10, R. Bartsch1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medicine 1, Clinical Division Of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 2 Department Of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 3 Department Of Medicine 1, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna/AT
  • 4 Department O Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 5 Department Of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 6 Department Of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 7 Department Of Radiotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 8 Department Of Neurosurgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 9 Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 - Vienna/AT
  • 10 Department Of Medicine 1, Clinical Division Of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria, 1090 - Vienna/AT

Resources

Login to access the resources on OncologyPRO.

If you do not have an ESMO account, please create one for free.

Abstract 4352

Background

Brain metastases (BM) are a particular clinical challenge occurring frequently in breast cancer patients and are associated with decreased survival due to the limited treatment options. Androgen receptor (AR) expression is an emerging therapeutic target in breast cancer as it is frequently expressed in the luminal A and B breast cancer (BC) subtypes and further in approximately one-third of basal-like cancers. As AR-positive BC displays a distinct biological behavior, we aimed to analyze AR expression in the particular context of breast cancer BM.

Methods

Patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer BM treated with neurosurgical resection were identified from the Vienna Brain Metastasis Registry and clinical data including patient characteristics, biological tumour subtypes and overall survival (OS) were obtained by retrospective chart review. Formalin fixed and paraffin embed tumour block containing viable BM tissue were retrieved from the Neuro-Biobank. Immunohistochemical staining of AR was performed and AR expression in the tumor nucleus was evaluated.

Results

46 BM samples from 46 individual patients with breast cancer were available for this analysis. AR expression of ≥ 1% was evident in 15/46 (32.6%) BM specimens and median AR-expression rate was 1% (range 0-60). A non-significantly higher rate of AR expression in ≥ 1% tumor cells and breast cancer subtype was evident as 9/18 (50.0%) BM of the luminal subtype, 4/16 (25.0%) of the HER2-positive subtype and 2/12 (16.7%) of triple-negative subtype specimens expressed AR (p > 0.05). Median brain metastases-free survival (BMFS) was 30 months (range 0-210). No association with BMFS and BM AR expression was evident (HR 1.0; 95% CI 1.0-1.0; p > 0.05). Median survival from diagnosis of BM was 9 months (range 0-104) in the entire cohort. No association of survival prognosis and AR expression ≥1% was evident (9 vs 10 months; HR 1.0; 95% CI 1.0-1.0; p > 0.05; log rank test).

Conclusions

According to our sample analysis, AR is expressed in one third of breast cancer brain metastases with the highest rates among the luminal breast cancer subtype and therefore might be a potential treatment target in the particular population of breast cancer patients with BM for future clinical investigation.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Rupert Bartsch, Medical University of Vienna.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.