Abstract 5121
Background
In the Phase III AURA3 trial (NCT02151981), osimertinib had superior efficacy compared with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy (CT) in patients (pts) with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC, whose disease progressed on or after first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Here we report the ctDNA genomic profile of pts with T790M-positive advanced NSCLC, whose disease progressed on osimertinib treatment during the AURA3 trial.
Methods
Pts with EGFR T790M advanced NSCLC, whose disease had progressed on first-line EGFR-TKI therapy, were randomized 2:1 to osimertinib (80 mg once daily) or platinum-based doublet CT. Paired plasma samples were collected at baseline and following disease progression and/or treatment discontinuation. Plasma samples were analyzed by next generation sequencing (NGS; Guardant Health, Guardant360, 73 gene panel).
Results
Among 279 pts randomized to the osimertinib treatment arm, paired plasma samples were available from 83 (30%) pts who had progressed and/or discontinued treatment (PD/DC). 73/83 (88%) pts had baseline detectable ctDNA EGFR mutations (L858R, exon 19 deletion or T790M) and were evaluable for this analysis. Among these 73 pts, 36 (49%) had no detectable T790M at PD/DC, and 11 (15%) acquired EGFR secondary mutation in C797 (C797S n=10; C797G n=1). Amplification of MET, HER2, and PIK3CA were detected in 14 (19%), 4 (5%), and 3 (4%) samples, respectively. Other mechanisms of acquired resistance included mutations in BRAF (V600E, n=3; 4%), KRAS (n=1; 1%) and PIK3CA (E545K, n=1; 1%), and oncogenic fusion mutations in FGFR3, RET and NTRK (n=3; 4%).
Conclusions
In this preliminary analysis from AURA3 of paired plasma samples from pts with detectable baseline plasma EGFR mutations and at PD/DC on osimertinib treatment, a diverse mixture of resistance mechanisms were detected, with MET amplification and EGFR C797S most common. No unexpected resistance mechanisms were observed in these second-line osimertinib-treated pts. Understanding resistance mechanisms in the first and second-line settings will help define appropriate combination therapies.
Clinical trial identification
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02151981
Editorial Acknowledgement
We thank Natalie Griffiths, PhD, from iMed Comms, who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca in accordance with Good Publications Practice (GPP3) guidelines (ismpp.org/gpp3).
Resources from the same session
5005 - Mechanisms of acquired resistance to first-line osimertinib: preliminary data from the phase III FLAURA study
Presenter: Suresh Ramalingam
Session: Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic - Invited Discussant LBA50 and one LBA TBC
Presenter: Charles Rudin
Session: Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
Invited Discussant LBA 52
Presenter: James Chih-Hsin Yang
Session: Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
5153 - Phase 2 study of tepotinib + gefitinib (TEP+GEF) in MET-positive (MET+)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant (MT) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Yi-Long Wu
Session: Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast
Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic - Invited Discussant One LBA TBC and 1377O
Presenter: Egbert Smit
Session: Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic
Resources:
Slides
Webcast
2110 - Results of the GEOMETRY mono-1 phase II study for evaluation of the MET inhibitor capmatinib (INC280) in patients (pts) with METΔex14 mutated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)
Presenter: Juergen Wolf
Session: Proffered paper session - NSCLC, metastatic
Resources:
Abstract
Slides
Webcast