Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

5314 - A new prognostic model for overall survival (OS) in second line (2L) for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC): Development and external validation

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Topics

Tumour Site

Renal Cell Cancer

Presenters

Lisa Derosa

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii303-viii331. 10.1093/annonc/mdy283

Authors

L. Derosa1, M.A. Bayar2, L. Albiges1, G. Le Teuff2, B. Escudier1

Author affiliations

  • 1 Department Of Medical Oncology, Gustave Roussy, 94805 - Villejuif/FR
  • 2 Biostatistics, Institut Gustave Roussy, 94800 - Villejuif/FR
More

Abstract 5314

Background

The IMDC classification scheme for OS has been validated in 2L mRCC. Recently, we showed that two new prognostic factors, Time from first to second line (<, ≥ 1 year) and tumor burden (<, ≥100 mm), are independently associated with OS in the same setting. Here, we present a new classification scheme.

Methods

mRCC patients treated in 2L between January 2005 and December 2014 after initial first line clinical trials at Gustave Roussy Cancer Campus (GRCC) formed the discovery set. Patients from 2 phase III clinical trials from Pfizer database (PFIZERDB), AXIS (NCT00678392) and INTORSECT (NCT00474786), formed the external validation set. In addition to the IMDC predictors, the 2 new prognostic factors were tested using a multivariable Cox model with a backward selection procedure. The performance of the new GRCC model and the classification scheme derived from it, measuring by R2, c-index and calibration, was evaluated on the validation set and compared to MSKCC and IMDC.

Results

Two-hundred and twenty-one patients were included in GRCC cohort and 855 patients in PFIZERDB. Median OS was similar in the two datasets (16.8 [95%CI=12.9-21.7] and 15.3 [13.6-17.2] months, respectively). Time from first to second line and tumor burden confirmed their significant effect on OS with HR = 1.68 [1.23-2.31] and 1.43 [1.03-1.99]. The new classification, derived by counting the number of factors, allows categorizing patients into 4 risk groups: median OS from the start of 2L in the validation cohort was not reached (NE) (95% CI 24.9-NE) in the favorable risk group (n = 20, 4 deaths, 0 risk factor), 21.8 months (11.6–15.8) in the intermediate risk group (n = 367, 135 deaths, 1-2 risk factors), 12.7 months (11.0–15.8) in the low-poor risk group (n = 347, 211 deaths, 3-4 risk factors), and 5.5 months (4.7–6.4) in the high-poor risk group (n = 121, 105 deaths, ≥5 risk factors). Not surprisingly, the incorporation of factors that characterize post first line features and the new stratification allowed a better performance compared to previous models.

Conclusions

The GRCC classification derived from the model is a new reliable prognostic tool that can be applied to better predict OS in previously treated mRCC patients.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Lisa Derosa.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.