Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

4395 - Ultrasound-guided femoro-popliteal block in lower limb sarcoma and cutaneous malignancy patients- Is it the time to abandon spinal anaesthesia for foot and ankle surgeries.

Date

22 Oct 2018

Session

Poster display session: Breast cancer - early stage, locally advanced & metastatic, CNS tumours, Developmental therapeutics, Genitourinary tumours - prostate & non-prostate, Palliative care, Psycho-oncology, Public health policy, Sarcoma, Supportive care

Presenters

Nupur Moda

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2018) 29 (suppl_8): viii603-viii640. 10.1093/annonc/mdy300

Authors

N. Moda

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Anesthesia, Critical Care And Pain Medicine, IMS & SUM Hospital SOA University, 751003 - Bhubaneswar/IN
More

Resources

Abstract 4395

Background

Ultrasound-guided regional anaesthesia has recently become very popular. The aim of this study was to compare the efficiency of Ultrasound-guided femoro-popliteal block (US-FPB) against spinal anaesthesia (SA) for foot and ankle surgeries in lower limb cancer (sarcoma and skin cancer) patients and to further define its role in intra-operative anaesthesia and post-operative analgesia.

Methods

This randomized controlled trial included 52 adult lower limb cancer patients. They were randomized into two groups. Patients from group A (experimental) received Ultrasound-guided femoro-popliteal block, while a spinal anesthesia (SA) was given in group B patients. In both the groups, Bupivacaine (0.5%) was used as local anaesthetic drug. The statistical analysis was done using student’s t-test and p value <0.05 was considered significant.

Results

25 patients from the first and 24 patients from the second group completed the study. Using modified Bromage score, levels of anaesthesia were found to be sufficient in both the groups without any statistically significant differences (p value=0.67). Average duration of postoperative analgesia was 12.3 hours and 2.7 hours in group A and B, respectively (p value<0.001).

Conclusions

Both US-FPB and SA provided sufficient and comparable anaesthesia for ankle and foot fractures. However, post-operative analgesia was significantly longer in US-FPB group with subsequent much less requirement of post-operative analgesics. Better and longer post-operative analgesia in US-FPB group also resulted in shorter rehabilitation periods and decreased time-gaps for beginning of joint movements.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Nupur Moda.

Funding

Has not received any funding.

Editorial Acknowledgement

Disclosure

The author has declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.