Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

3807 - Modified Staging Classification for Gastric Neuroendocrine Carcinomas on the Basis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer

Date

10 Sep 2017

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Staging Procedures (not Imaging);  Neuroendocrine Tumours

Presenters

Jianwei Xie

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v142-v157. 10.1093/annonc/mdx368

Authors

J. Xie, H. Chang-Ming, C. Zheng, P. Li, J. Lin

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 - Fuzhou/CN
More

Resources

Abstract 3807

Background

The purpose is to explore the value of the seventh edition of AJCC staging and improved AJCC staging in the evaluation of the prognosis of gastric neuroendocrine carcinoma (GNEC).

Methods

We analyzed retrospectively the clinical and pathological data of 427 GNEC patients from SEER database and 129 GNEC patients in single center. AIC and C index were used to evaluate the distinguishing capability of different TNM staging systems.

Results

In SEER database, the 5-year survival rate stratified by AJCC staging of GENC (I, IIa, IIb, IIIa, IIIb, IV) were 68%, 61%, 46%, 22%, 21%, and 10% respectively. While in single center, the 5-year survival rate of different stages were 100%, 60%, 27%, 16%, 22%, and 0% respectively. From the survival curve analysis, there are significant crossovers between the IIIB survival curves of SEER database as well as single center and those of IIIA and IIB. In SEER database, the T staging and the age of disease diagnosis were independent factors affecting the prognosis of IIIB patients. According to the T staging, the IIIB was divided into four subgroups: T1N1,T2N1, T3N1, and T4N1. According to the principle of similar survival rate, the new AJCC staging is composed of different stages: nI(T1N0M0), n IIa (T1N1M0, T2N0M0), n IIb (T2N1M0, T3N0M0), n IIIa (T3N1M0, T4N0M0), n IIIb (T3N1M0, T4N0M0) and n IV (T1-4NxM1). The survival curve of the new AJCC staging showed less crossover per stage, obtaining a smaller AIC value (1572 vs. 1583) and a smaller c-index (0.7505 vs. 0.7421). It is discovered that through employing the data of single center as external validation, the new AJCC staging can better distinguish different TNM staging.

Conclusions

Dividing IIIB of the seventh edition of AJCC staging into various sub-stages has significant prognostic value and the new AJCC staging can better distinguish the stages of GNEC.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Changming Huang

Funding

None

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.