Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

1345 - Improved provision of written information on metastatic spinal cord compression to at-risk cancer patients at a tertiary referral centre

Date

10 Sep 2017

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA);  Bioethical Principles and GCP

Presenters

Preethika Mahaligam

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v511-v520. 10.1093/annonc/mdx385

Authors

P. Mahaligam, K. Ng, A. McLaren, K. Fordham, J. King

Author affiliations

  • Medical Oncology, Royal Free Hospital, London, NW3 2QG - London/GB
More

Resources

Abstract 1345

Background

Metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) affects up to 10% of patients with disseminated malignancies, and early diagnosis correlates with improved clinical outcomes. Up to 85% of patients who present with MSCC already have motor deficit by the time of presentation. We investigated our Trust’s compliance with national guidelines on providing at-risk patients with written information on the signs and symptoms of MSCC. Following a period of educational intervention we re-audited our practice.

Methods

All Oncology doctors and Specialist Nurses at the Royal Free Hospital were completed an online survey on their knowledge of national guidelines and their clinical practice. We delivered an educational intervention (including formal teaching and presentation at Departmental meetings, case discussions and providing patient information leaflets to clinicians) and re-audited our practice after 3 months.

Results

There were 29 and 20 respondents to the baseline and repeat surveys respectively. 57% vs 84% reported being moderately or very familiar with the MSCC guidelines; 32% vs 47% reported knowing where the information leaflets were kept; 3% vs 15% reported providing written information on MSCC to at risk patients at least every month. (baseline and repeat surveys, respectively)

There was a consensus amongst the clinicians that patients with spinal metastases should be considered at “highest risk”, and verbal information about the risks of MSCC was most commonly given to this group. There was a 42% increase in the proportion of respondents who provided written information on the risk of MSCC to patients with spinal metastases (19 vs 61%) following the intervention.

Conclusions

1) Provision of written patient information leaflets, formal education sessions and case discussions with clinicians resulted in increased knowledge of guidelines on MSCC at 3 months, and positive changes in clinical practice. 2) There was a significant increase in the provision of written information to the highest risk patient groups (19 to 61%). 3) By increasing patient awareness, we can increase the proportion of early self-presentations and diagnosis. This will lead to prompt intervention and improvement of neurological outcomes.

Clinical trial identification

Not applicable

Legal entity responsible for the study

Oncology Department, Royal Free Hospital NHS Foundation Trust

Funding

None

Disclosure

All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.