Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Poster display session

3619 - Genotyping circulating tumor DNA identifies metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) patients highly sensitive to Sym004

Date

11 Sep 2017

Session

Poster display session

Topics

Cancers in Adolescents and Young Adults (AYA);  Translational Research;  Colon and Rectal Cancer

Presenters

Clara Montagut Viladot

Citation

Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v22-v42. 10.1093/annonc/mdx363

Authors

C. Montagut Viladot1, A. Bardelli2, T. Tuxen Poulsen3, R. Dienstmann4, M. Kragh5, S. Kopetz6, K. Koefoed3, F. Ciardiello7, C. Ding8, J. Vidal1, J. Clausell-Tormos3, G. Siravegna2, T. Lindsted3, M.W. Pedersen3, G. Rospo2, G. Argilés Martinez9, P. Nadler3, I.D. Horak3, J. Tabernero10

Author affiliations

  • 1 Medical Oncology, Hospital del Mar, 08003 - Barcelona/ES
  • 2 Dept Of Oncology, IRCCs University of Torino School of Medicine, 10060 - Candiolo/IT
  • 3 -, Symphogen, Ballerup/DK
  • 4 Oncology Data Science (odyssey) Group, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 5 -, Symphogen, -/DK
  • 6 Gi Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston/US
  • 7 U.o.c. Di Oncologia Medica E Di Ematologia, Università degli Studi della Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 - naples/IT
  • 8 -, Symphogen, Somerville, New Jersey/US
  • 9 Medical Oncology, Vall d’Hebrón Institut d’Oncologia (VHIO),, 08035 - Barcelona/ES
  • 10 Medical Oncology, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, 08035 - Barcelona/ES
More

Resources

Abstract 3619

Background

Acquired resistance of mCRC patients (pts) to anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is frequently due to mutations in RAS/BRAF and EGFR extracellular domain (ECD), and amplifications in MET/ERBB2. Studies suggest that some anti-EGFR mAb refractory pts retain tumor EGFR-dependency potentially targetable by more efficacious agents such as Sym004 – a mixture of two non-overlapping mAb targeting EGFR for degradation. A Phase 2b trial of Sym004 in 254 mCRC pts tissue RAS wt that relapsed on anti-EGFR blockade was recently completed.

Methods

Baseline circulating tumor (ct)DNA profiles (Guardant360, Guardant Health, N = 193 pts) were obtained from blood samples collected from pts in the Sym004 Phase2b trial. Serial blood samples during treatment were analyzed for EGFR-ECD mutation dynamics.

Results

High mutant allele frequency (MAF >20%) of KRAS/NRAS was found in 5% of pts and BRAF V600E and EGFR-ECD mutations in 6.7% and 25% of pts, respectively. At least 1 of these mechanisms of resistance was identified in 32% of the pts. Mutations in KRAS, NRAS, and BRAF V600E, and amplifications of ERBB2 and MET were more likely to co-occur with EGFR-ECD mutations, demonstrating genomic complexity developed as a result of EGFR blockade. Comparative analysis of MAFs of driver genes indicated that EGFR-ECD mutations are subclonal events. The absence of any EGFR-ECD/BRAF/high RAS MAF mutation at baseline was associated with a significantly improved OS in the Sym004 treated pts as compared to control arm with investigator’s choice chemotherapy. Sym004 has previously been demonstrated to retain in vitro efficacy in EGFR-ECD mutated cancer cells, and ctDNA monitoring demonstrated decrease in EGFR-ECD in Sym004 treated pts. This suggests that EGFR-ECD mutated cells are targeted by Sym004, but this activity does not translate into clinically meaningful OS benefit, likely due to other co-occuring resistance mechanisms.

Conclusions

Comprehensive liquid biomarker profiling of 193 mCRC pts captured high intrapatient heterogeneity following anti-EGFR therapy, and identified a highly Sym004 sensitive mCRC pts subset with a RAS/RAF/EGFR-ECD wild type profile. Our data indicates heterogeneous responses of different subclones to targeted agents in mCRC.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Medical Oncology Department, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain

Funding

Funded by Symphogen

Disclosure

C. Montagut Viladot: Advisory Board for Amgen, Bayer, Merck Serono, Sanofi, Symphogen. T. Tuxen Poulsen, M. Kragh, K. Koefoed, C. Ding, J. Clausell-Tormos, T. Lindsted, M.W. Pedersen, P. Nadler, I.D. Horak: Full time employee at Symphogen. S. Kopetz: Advisory boards for Amgen, Merrimack, Bayer, Sanofi, Array BioPharma, Genentech, MolecularMatch, Symphogen, Guardant Health, EMD Serono, Merck. J. Tabernero: Advisory boards for Amgen, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Chugai, Genentech, Lilly, MSD, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, Symphogen, Taiho, and Takeda. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.