Oops, you're using an old version of your browser so some of the features on this page may not be displaying properly.

MINIMAL Requirements: Google Chrome 24+Mozilla Firefox 20+Internet Explorer 11Opera 15–18Apple Safari 7SeaMonkey 2.15-2.23

Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal

3861 - Comparison of the eighth and seventh editions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM staging systems for gastric cancer: proposal for a simplified and improved TNM staging system


11 Sep 2017


Gastrointestinal tumours, non-colorectal


Staging Procedures (not Imaging);  Gastric Cancer


Junpeng Lin


Annals of Oncology (2017) 28 (suppl_5): v209-v268. 10.1093/annonc/mdx369


J. Lin, H. Chang-Ming, J. Lin, C. Zheng, P. Li

Author affiliations

  • Department Of Gastric Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, 350001 - Fuzhou/CN


Abstract 3861


To evaluate the prognostic significance of the eighth edition of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM staging classification for gastric cancer.


Data from 4,957 consecutive patients who underwent radical gastrectomy between 1997 and 2014 were retrieved from our database. The prognostic value of the eighth edition was compared with that of the seventh edition of the AJCC TNM classification. The analysis was repeated in an external validation set.


Significant differences in 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were observed for each TNM stage when using the eighth edition system, and smaller AIC values and a higher c-statistic were observed relative to those of the seventh edition. However, the OS rates in each subgroup of stage III patients in the eighth edition were significantly different. Additionally, patients with the same pN stage, namely the pT4a and pT4b groups, showed similar 5-year OS. Based on the survival data, we propose a simplified staging system. In the improved TNM (iTNM) staging system, the subgroups of a given TNM stage do not have statistically significant OS differences. The iTNM staging exhibits superior prognostic stratification, with lower AIC values and a higher c-statistic than the eighth edition TNM classification. Similar results were obtained with the external validation dataset.


The eighth edition of the AJCC TNM classification provides superior prognosis to that of the seventh edition. However, it remains associated with some stage migration. The iTNM staging system permits simplification and slightly better prognostic prediction.

Clinical trial identification

Legal entity responsible for the study

Changming Huang




All authors have declared no conflicts of interest.

This site uses cookies. Some of these cookies are essential, while others help us improve your experience by providing insights into how the site is being used.

For more detailed information on the cookies we use, please check our Privacy Policy.

Customise settings
  • Necessary cookies enable core functionality. The website cannot function properly without these cookies, and you can only disable them by changing your browser preferences.